Feds Might Create a New GIS Master Group

In an apparent about-face on a proposal to revamp the way federal, state and local governments collect and share geographic data, Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt this week told a House subcommittee that it should consider key points of a plan to create a new geographic information system coordinating group.

Babbitt made his recommendations June 9 at a hearing before the U.S. House Government Management, Information and Technology Subcommittee.

The plan originally was hatched as a proposal issued by the National Academy of Public Administration last year.

The plan calls for the creation of a nonprofit National Spatial Data Council (NSDC) to coordinate activities among federal, state and local governments. The report also calls for the creation of a federal Geographic Data Service that would consolidate many federal geographic information functions and serve as a provider of basic mapping data.

At issue is the use of enormous amounts of geographic data that could be used more effectively -- for example, to plan for natural disasters, examine the effects of pollution, help community leaders develop solutions for social problems in neighborhoods and target government services where they are needed.

Each year, agencies at all levels of government collect millions of bits of geographic information. That information relates specific points on the Earth to such variables as temperature, demographics, vegetation coverage and land development activities. On electronic maps, the data can be layered to show how a proposed real estate development, for example, would affect the breeding habitat of a particular bird species.

But much of the same geographic information stored in databases nationwide is redundant, and much of the information cannot be shared among different agencies because standards for describing, indexing and sharing information do not exist. The NSDC would help develop solutions for standards.

Just last summer, Babbitt had opposed the creation of the group. Interior officials "are concerned about the prospect of legislation for...creation of a National Spatial Data Council," he wrote in a letter sent in June 1998 to the NAPA co-director for the project.

Babbitt also wrote that "the Department of the Interior is concerned about the recommendations in the report which propose legislation to reorganize federal programs and create a new bureau."

But in testimony last week before the House Government Management, Information and Technology Subcommittee, Babbitt said Congress should investigate creating a sturdier "framework" for the sharing of geographic information.

"I do urge you to entertain some direction for the federal partners and how they go about gathering information," Babbitt said. He added that Congress may want to put some "starch" into the relationship among industry as well as state, local and federal agencies that produce geographic information.

He also said Congress should investigate creating a federally chartered NSDC that could operate as a private nonprofit for coordinating geographic data activities.

Babbitt said a maturation of the geographic information industry means that now may be an appropriate time to consider such proposals. Also, a source in Interior said Babbitt only recently finished reading the NAPA report, which may explain his softened stance on its proposals.

Babbitt did caution against mandating technical standards for how information could be shared, suggesting that creators and users of geographic data should be allowed to work together to develop consensus.

Other witnesses at the hearing said governments and industry should work more closely and in more of an equal partnership to solve the mapping problems. So far among federal agencies, coordination of geographic information activities and attempts to develop a National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI), which would make information sharing easier, have been headed by the Federal Geographic Data Committee, with input from state and local groups and industry.

But other witnesses at last week's hearing called for creating "true partnerships" for coordinating the collection and sharing of geographic information. Thomas Sweet Jr., representative for the Pennsylvania GIS Consortium, suggested that Congress consider budget mechanisms that will ensure that federal agencies do a better job of coordinating geographic information activities.

Larry Ayers, executive vice president of software company Intergraph Corp. and a member of the NAPA panel that wrote the report, said Congress should pass a law requiring the development of the NSDI. Such a law would put more heat on agencies to complete the project. Currently, federal agencies developing the NSDI work under a presidential directive.

Members of the House subcommittee indicated that Congress should become more involved in setting parameters to foster the sharing of geographic information. "I believe it is imperative that Congress becomes more engaged in efforts to promote 'best practices' and provide the necessary resources to implement this technology in a manner that will yield the greatest benefits for society," said Rep. Paul Kanjorski (D-Pa.).

Subcommittee chairman Rep. Stephen Horn (R-Calif.) said he and Kanjorski plan to collaborate on a legislative proposal in the wake of the hearing.

-- L. Scott Tillett

Featured

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

  • Comment
    Pilot Class. The author and Barbie Flowers are first row third and second from right, respectively.

    How VA is disrupting tech delivery

    A former Digital Service specialist at the Department of Veterans Affairs explains efforts to transition government from a legacy "project" approach to a more user-centered "product" method.

  • Cloud
    cloud migration

    DHS cloud push comes with complications

    A pressing data center closure schedule and an ensuing scramble to move applications means that some Homeland Security components might need more than one hop to get to the cloud.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.