The Enterprise Fights Back

These days, if you go to a conference for the National Governors' Association, the National Association of Counties or the National League of Cities, you can bet that at some point an elected official will get up and say something like, "You should see what we're doing back home in Whichway Junction with information technology. It is empowering our citizens, lowering the cost of government and attracting high-tech jobs to our area. In fact we've started calling ourselves 'Silicon Junction.' "

IT is becoming a touchstone of local politics and a basic, even essential, tool for improving the quality of state and local government services. That's good-at least for a while. Then it seems, as more and more IT is added across the government enterprise, some legal or regulatory repair is necessary to prevent unforeseen social, economic or political consequences or even abuses of IT.

Several of our stories this month have in common the idea that government executives who want to promote the general welfare cannot simply add more IT to a problem and hope for smooth productivity gains. Ultimately, they will run up against a wall where the technology exerts an equal but negative opposing force. Then IT can be more of a political problem than something to crow about on the stump.

Our cover story this month, for example, is about how state and local government policy-makers, their counterparts in the federal sphere and electronic commerce companies are grappling with how to tax transactions done over the Internet. On one hand, you hear local officials proclaim the Internet as a magic carpet that economic prosperity will ride into town on, and then you hear others complain that it is robbing the community of its tax base.

Another example is our story about the new breed of supermax prisons. These high-tech bastions are a corrections officer's dream. Corrections officers practically never have to come into physical contact with inmates. But as one observer has pointed out, most inmates-even those in a supermax-eventually will get out. We don't know what these high-tech incubators will cast back upon us.

Meanwhile, Connecticut last month abandoned its experiment of seeking an enterprisewide IT solution-at least one provided by a single vendor-for its executive branch agencies. The politics and management of attempting so sweeping a change ultimately was too tough to handle.

State and local governments are beginning an era of creating and tying together systems across the government enterprise. These stories show that it will take extraordinary political power and leadership to bring about these important infrastructure changes. They also show how important it is for IT executives throughout the state and local community to share their successes and failures. While the experiences might be local, the lessons learned can be applied throughout the community.

Paul McCloskey

Editor

civic.com

Featured

  • FCW Perspectives
    human machine interface

    Your agency isn’t ready for AI

    To truly take advantage, government must retool both its data and its infrastructure.

  • Cybersecurity
    secure network (bluebay/Shutterstock.com)

    Federal CISO floats potential for new supply chain regs

    The federal government's top IT security chief and canvassed industry for feedback on how to shape new rules of the road for federal acquisition and procurement.

  • People
    DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, shown here at her Nov. 8, 2017, confirmation hearing. DHS Photo by Jetta Disco

    DHS chief Nielsen resigns

    Kirstjen Nielsen, the first Homeland Security secretary with a background in cybersecurity, is being replaced on an acting basis by the Customs and Border Protection chief. Her last day is April 10.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.