Sending workers on the road

From the tangled suburbs of Northern Virginia to the remote corners of South

Dakota, federal workers are becoming mobile workers — to the delight and

consternation of their supervisors.

Federal managers say they are eager to reap the benefits of a more productive

and flexible work force, but their enthusiasm is tempered by concerns about

security, training and equipment maintenance that arise when formerly deskbound

employees grab a laptop and hit the road.

Two kinds of mobile worker exist in the federal government, said Wanda

Smith, chief operating officer for the Federal Technology Service's AnyWARE

Government program (www.fts.gsa. gov/html/fts_mall/AnyWARE_ Government.html):

Longtime mobile employees such as Internal Revenue Service field agents

and, increasingly, office employees who want to work while traveling, check

e-mail from home or occasionally telecommute to avoid bad weather or traffic.

Smith said the second group is emerging because "government is finally

beginning to realize that people logging in from home can increase productivity."

One of the challenges for agencies is to identify supervisors who are

able and willing to manage mobile workers.

"Office-bound managers have traditionally been suspicious of home workers,

but for the most part, people are able to manage themselves and their time,"

Smith said. "It's important to find the right manager, not one who thinks

it's a dumb idea or is suspicious that workers are goofing off."

Agencies with experience in managing mobile workers generally have specific

goals for workers at home or on the road, and such policies increase the

success of their mobile programs. "IRS agents have a very clear idea of

what's expected of them, and the agency makes sure they have the right tools

to do their job," Smith said.

Looking at mobile tools such as personal digital assistants, wireless

modems and cell phones, Smith said he sees agencies approving them in ones

and twos, or eager workers might buy their own gadgets. But in general,

the mobile tool of choice is still the laptop computer.

The reason for the cautious acceptance of PDAs is twofold, according to

John Leavitt, an advisory sales specialist who handles government accounts

for IBM Corp.'s Personal Systems Group in Raleigh, N.C.

First, agencies are just beginning to explore applications for sub-notebook

devices. "I don't think everybody truly understands the power of those machines.

They think you can keep a calendar and address book, but people don't realize

the capability goes way beyond that," said Leavitt, who added that he is

in preliminary talks with at least one government agency about the possibility

of using digital notepads in the field.

Second, security is a big concern for all mobile computers — but especially

for PalmPilots and other super-portable devices. A user who checks office

e-mail with a PDA is suddenly in possession of a small, easily stolen device

carrying government data. "You can't control where that PDA goes with that

data on it," Leavitt said. Some IT departments are using passwords to ensure

only the authorized user accesses the device; others have developed standards

lists as a way of limiting the number and type of digital devices, even

privately purchased ones, being used by employees.

Security and control are two main reasons the Gartner Group Inc., a

Stamford, Conn.-based research firm, advises organizations to insist that

users access networks only via government-issued equipment. "We recommend

that if you're going to have people do work from home, don't let them use

their home PC," said Ken Dulaney, Gartner's vice president of mobile computing

in the company's San Jose, Calif., office. With home PCs, "there

possible way to reliably enforce security," Dulaney said.

Security aside, IBM's Leavitt said his federal clients' main priority

was to keep laptop operations as simple as possible. "There are so many

different levels of users, agencies are going with the lowest common denominator

and making the machine as easy to use as possible." Techniques include limiting

the number of external devices, requiring that options like Ethernet adapters

be internal so as not to be lost, and buying extra AC adapters so users

can keep on working if one is lost or goes bad.

The Census Bureau's technologies management office in Suitland, Md.,

strives for simplicity by preloading applications and in some cases restricting

access to operating systems and other applications.

"We do try to make it as canned as possible," said Jane Polzer, decennial

liaison for the technologies management office. "We try to restrict folks

to a menu so they don't get out into a root directory." The technologies

management office oversees about 3,200 laptops in field offices and is deploying

9,000 more laptops for accuracy and coverage evaluation — determining the

undercount and overcount — related to the 2000 national census.

Some laptop-based Census applications are additionally password-protected,

and procedures such as remote connect, which many federal managers cited

as an area of confusion for users, are automated as much as possible, Polzer


The technology aspects of a mobile project are integrated whenever possible

into the basic training for a particular program. "The machines themselves

haven't been the biggest problem; the problems are the field problems that

workers typically have," Polzer said. "That's good news for us because it

means the tools are working."

When the tools don't work — or workers can't figure them out — users

follow a help hierarchy that leads them first to a local field leader in

close proximity, then to a regional Census office and finally to the technologies

management office. The Census 2000 project will have its own help desk.

Many federal managers say that employees should be trained to troubleshoot

their own technical problems in the field. But one Agriculture Department

pilot project is taking the opposite approach, at least for now. "If there's

trouble, we get on a plane and go help them fix it," said Dick Paden, Washington

business developer for ICES Ltd., a Minneapolis technology staffing firm

that frequently works with federal contractors. Paden is building a set

of technologically retrofitted recreational vehicles that will enable USDA

agents to bring the capabilities of a fixed service center to underserved

rural areas such as an Indian reservation in South Dakota.

The RVs have a power generator, built-in cellular communications and

two-way Inmarsat satellite service for areas where cellular coverage is

patchy, laptop computers, printers, fax machines and multimedia equipment.

Paden said that despite the plethora of systems, the USDA agents will need

no special training. "The way we've put it together, a person needs just

general computer-use knowledge. Everything is triggered through macros."

Because of that and ICES' toll-free help desk, Paden doesn't expect

to be hopping on an airplane for most problems mobile USDA workers face.

But ICES employees are charged with fixing the big problems, such as satellite


ICES delivered the first RV to the USDA in December, with six due in

the first quarter of 2000 as part of the proof of concept phase. A total

of 18 will be deployed if the project wins full approval.

Is mobile technology — ranging from a laptop to a fully configured RV

— worth the extra effort in security, training, management and support?

Thanks to the increased flexibility and improved efficiency enjoyed by a

mobile work force, the answer is nearly always yes.

"If the Department of Agriculture went out and put in a fixed facility

to service these people, they'd be facing an upfront cost of two or three

times what a vehicle costs," Paden said.


  • FCW Perspectives
    remote workers (elenabsl/

    Post-pandemic IT leadership

    The rush to maximum telework did more than showcase the importance of IT -- it also forced them to rethink their own operations.

  • Management
    shutterstock image By enzozo; photo ID: 319763930

    Where does the TMF Board go from here?

    With a $1 billion cash infusion, relaxed repayment guidelines and a surge in proposals from federal agencies, questions have been raised about whether the board overseeing the Technology Modernization Fund has been scaled to cope with its newfound popularity.

Stay Connected