Changes afoot for Navy's intranet deal

The Navy held a closed-door meeting Wednesday with officials from the four

potential prime contractors vying for ownership of the $16 billion Navy/Marine

Corps Intranet contract to map out what sources on Capitol Hill say could

be a "major change" to the contract.

A source on the House Appropriations Committee said the Navy called the

meeting because of "political considerations" because the committee does

not approve of the procurement in its current form. The committee has "concerns

that the Navy has not done the homework it needed to do and patently rejects

the Navy's view of the rules as they apply to a procurement of this size,"

the source said.

Scheduled for award in June, the N/MCI deal has come under fire from members

of Congress who are concerned that the Navy is pushing ahead with what would

amount to the largest networking contract in government without requesting

any new money in its fiscal 2001 budget request.

Lawmakers have also questioned the Navy's overall contracting process, lambasting

the service for dragging its feet on a business case analysis and not producing

proof that the contract will comply with federal regulations, such as the

Clinger-Cohen Act.

Although the Navy would not comment on the results of the meeting at press

time, an industry source said Congress is concerned that some of the money

earmarked for N/MCI is not coming out of operations and maintenance accounts,

as the Navy contends, but out of base acquisition accounts, potentially

drawing money from nontechnology-related projects. The source also said

an amendment may be drafted to allay Congress' concerns.

Another source on the Hill said the Navy has a good chance of being able

to move forward on time with N/MCI if it opts to conduct a smaller pilot

project first. "The appropriations committee is not likely to stand in the

wings if the Navy doesn't make an appropriate choice here," the source said.


  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected


Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.