Congress legislates, procrastinates on tech

Not all members of Congress are as technologically savvy as the people

they represent.

Every year members of Congress debate information technology bills on

topics ranging from bridging the digital divide to e-government to online

procurement. But as Congress pushes technology mandates on federal agencies,

Congress itself is slow to enter the Information Age, according to industry

experts who gathered last month at a conference to discuss the Hill's technology


A Senate staff member who asked not to be identified said she had to explain

to her boss how to access the Internet and use a mouse so that the senator

could view his own World Wide Web site.

"Not all [members of Congress] are familiar with the latest technology,"

the staff member said. "We not only have to bridge the digital divide in

the nation but in Congress as well."

While technology offers great opportunities to immediately respond to

constituents' requests, many members of Congress are leery of using technology

to correspond, according to Vic Fazio, senior partner at Clark and Weinstock

and a former Democratic congressman from California.

"It is difficult to tell who has sent an e-mail message and where it

came from," Fazio said during a March 29 Library of Congress Conference.

"Most members are not interested in the views of those who don't vote for

them or have the potential to vote for them, so when an office is inundated

with messages it is sometimes easier not to respond."

According to Daniel Mulhollan, director of Congressional Research Services

at the Library of Congress, many congressional staffs are fearful of using

technology because electronic records created are not always confidential.

"I have been told by several staffs that they have a policy not to create

anything electronically that they wouldn't want to see printed on the front

page in the morning," he said. "There is always a chance that e-mail messages

or information on your hard drive may be subpoenaed."

Legislators fear that their successors could access — and in some cases

have accessed — confidential electronic documents left behind to "create

hay," Fazio added. "You may think a document was deleted from your computer

and it hasn't been. It has made people afraid to put anything in writing

and has impeded the conversation flow."

But the fear of misuse should not supersede a member's use of technology,

said Mary Jane Collipriest, public affairs officer for Sen. Robert Bennett

(R-Utah). "There is risk in any information sharing. You have to weigh the

benefits of using technology, which greatly outweighs the cons."

Bennett's office uses technology whenever possible. Technology has helped

staff members stay in touch with one another as well as with constituents

and fellow members of Congress.

"The technology is here to stay. It has permeated our lives and is an

undeniable fact of life," Collipriest said. "By not using technology we

are robbing ourselves of a valuable tool."

Congress members' fears about using new technology have not been confined

to individual legislative offices. In 1995 Congress approved the distribution

of laptop computers to all incoming freshmen. Laptops provided access to

the congressional intranet so that newcomers could keep up on legislation

and learn about Congress prior to taking office.

What Congress forgot to tell the newly elected senators and representatives,

however, was that electronic devices were not allowed on the floor of neither

the House nor the Senate.

However, nearly one-third of all state legislatures allow personal electronic

devices in their chambers, according to a congressional report released

in July 1999. In California, General Assembly members use laptops "to instantly

access analyses of the bills prepared each session by nonpartisan scholars,

bill digests and status, the complete history of each bill, and the members'

previous votes on bills," the report stated.

Sen. Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.) believes that laptops would be an asset to the

congressional process and plans to introduce legislation this year which

will allow laptops on the floor, said Lindsay Holmen, deputy press secretary

for Enzi.

"Laptops would allow for volumes of information to be available at a

[member's] fingertips," she said. "It would save [members of Congress] from

ruffling through piles of papers which is very distracting. [Enzi] wants

to make sure the legislative branch is not weakened because it is relying

on old technology."


  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected


Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.