USPS: Address unknown?

The U.S. Postal Service's decision to become a dot-com earlier this year

really hit the mark, but not as USPS officials intended.

The Internet address change from to ostensibly reflected

the agency's burgeoning electronic commerce strategy, which began with business-to-business

applications for supporting traditional shipping customers and recently

evolved to include support for online communications.

But the dot-com moniker also reflects the agency's competitive landscape.

USPS believes it could lose tens of billions of dollars in revenue each

year as people turn to the Internet to send messages and pay bills.

Rather than watch its business dwindle, the Postal Service has decided

to strike back, extending its traditional services to the online arena.

New services include electronic postmarks and certified delivery for e-mail,

as well as its own e-bill service.

That is where the agency's real trouble begins. A vociferous group of

critics charge USPS with overstepping its bounds by moving into online communications.

The Postal Service has numerous unfair advantages, critics say, including

a multibillion-dollar revenue base in first-class mail, from which it can

fund its New Economy venture.

At first glance, the argument makes sense. USPS is chartered with providing

communities nationwide with reliable and affordable mail delivery, no matter

where they are located. That charter does not include e-mail, and USPS appears

to have no business competing with the private sector in this new arena.

But, in fact, USPS is forced to compete. Recast as an independent agency

in 1971, the Postal Service must make enough money to pay its operating

costs. That is, the agency must run itself like a business — even though

its charter still requires the agency to provide "universal access" to mail

delivery, something no business would be saddled with.

As long as the nation is committed to this model of public mail service,

it remains in the government's best interest to give USPS the ability to

react as dot-coms stream into the market and erode the agency's revenue

base. To do otherwise is bad business.


  • Defense
    Soldiers from the Old Guard test the second iteration of the Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS) capability set during an exercise at Fort Belvoir, VA in Fall 2019. Photo by Courtney Bacon

    IVAS and the future of defense acquisition

    The Army’s Integrated Visual Augmentation System has been in the works for years, but the potentially multibillion deal could mark a paradigm shift in how the Defense Department buys and leverages technology.

  • Cybersecurity
    Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas  (U.S. Coast Guard photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Lora Ratliff)

    Mayorkas announces cyber 'sprints' on ransomware, ICS, workforce

    The Homeland Security secretary announced a series of focused efforts to address issues around ransomware, critical infrastructure and the agency's workforce that will all be launched in the coming weeks.

Stay Connected