USPS: Address unknown?

The U.S. Postal Service's decision to become a dot-com earlier this year

really hit the mark, but not as USPS officials intended.

The Internet address change from to ostensibly reflected

the agency's burgeoning electronic commerce strategy, which began with business-to-business

applications for supporting traditional shipping customers and recently

evolved to include support for online communications.

But the dot-com moniker also reflects the agency's competitive landscape.

USPS believes it could lose tens of billions of dollars in revenue each

year as people turn to the Internet to send messages and pay bills.

Rather than watch its business dwindle, the Postal Service has decided

to strike back, extending its traditional services to the online arena.

New services include electronic postmarks and certified delivery for e-mail,

as well as its own e-bill service.

That is where the agency's real trouble begins. A vociferous group of

critics charge USPS with overstepping its bounds by moving into online communications.

The Postal Service has numerous unfair advantages, critics say, including

a multibillion-dollar revenue base in first-class mail, from which it can

fund its New Economy venture.

At first glance, the argument makes sense. USPS is chartered with providing

communities nationwide with reliable and affordable mail delivery, no matter

where they are located. That charter does not include e-mail, and USPS appears

to have no business competing with the private sector in this new arena.

But, in fact, USPS is forced to compete. Recast as an independent agency

in 1971, the Postal Service must make enough money to pay its operating

costs. That is, the agency must run itself like a business — even though

its charter still requires the agency to provide "universal access" to mail

delivery, something no business would be saddled with.

As long as the nation is committed to this model of public mail service,

it remains in the government's best interest to give USPS the ability to

react as dot-coms stream into the market and erode the agency's revenue

base. To do otherwise is bad business.


  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

  • Comment
    Pilot Class. The author and Barbie Flowers are first row third and second from right, respectively.

    How VA is disrupting tech delivery

    A former Digital Service specialist at the Department of Veterans Affairs explains efforts to transition government from a legacy "project" approach to a more user-centered "product" method.

Stay Connected


Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.