USPS: Address unknown?

The U.S. Postal Service's decision to become a dot-com earlier this year

really hit the mark, but not as USPS officials intended.

The Internet address change from to ostensibly reflected

the agency's burgeoning electronic commerce strategy, which began with business-to-business

applications for supporting traditional shipping customers and recently

evolved to include support for online communications.

But the dot-com moniker also reflects the agency's competitive landscape.

USPS believes it could lose tens of billions of dollars in revenue each

year as people turn to the Internet to send messages and pay bills.

Rather than watch its business dwindle, the Postal Service has decided

to strike back, extending its traditional services to the online arena.

New services include electronic postmarks and certified delivery for e-mail,

as well as its own e-bill service.

That is where the agency's real trouble begins. A vociferous group of

critics charge USPS with overstepping its bounds by moving into online communications.

The Postal Service has numerous unfair advantages, critics say, including

a multibillion-dollar revenue base in first-class mail, from which it can

fund its New Economy venture.

At first glance, the argument makes sense. USPS is chartered with providing

communities nationwide with reliable and affordable mail delivery, no matter

where they are located. That charter does not include e-mail, and USPS appears

to have no business competing with the private sector in this new arena.

But, in fact, USPS is forced to compete. Recast as an independent agency

in 1971, the Postal Service must make enough money to pay its operating

costs. That is, the agency must run itself like a business — even though

its charter still requires the agency to provide "universal access" to mail

delivery, something no business would be saddled with.

As long as the nation is committed to this model of public mail service,

it remains in the government's best interest to give USPS the ability to

react as dot-coms stream into the market and erode the agency's revenue

base. To do otherwise is bad business.


  • Management
    shutterstock image By enzozo; photo ID: 319763930

    Where does the TMF Board go from here?

    With a $1 billion cash infusion, relaxed repayment guidelines and a surge in proposals from federal agencies, questions have been raised about whether the board overseeing the Technology Modernization Fund has been scaled to cope with its newfound popularity.

  • IT Modernization
    shutterstock image By enzozo; photo ID: 319763930

    OMB provides key guidance for TMF proposals amid surge in submissions

    Deputy Federal CIO Maria Roat details what makes for a winning Technology Modernization Fund proposal as agencies continue to submit major IT projects for potential funding.

Stay Connected