Picking the right flat panel

Government buyers are accustomed to looking at three main specifications

when shopping for monitors: size, dot pitch and resolution. However, those

traditional specifications are treated differently when looking at flat-panel


Size: This is straightforward when comparing monitors that are of like

design. But it's a bit trickier when comparing CRT with LCD because CRT

display size refers to the size of the CRT's glass, not the viewable area

displayed on that glass. So 19-inch CRTs tend to have a viewable size of

less than 18 inches. LCD size is an accurate representation of the display.

So the correct comparison with a 19-inch CRT is to a 17-inch LCD.

Dot pitch: This refers to how far apart, in millimeters, the color pixels

are in a CRT. The closer together and the smaller the number, the better.

However, dot-pitch specifications do not apply to flat-panel displays.

Resolution: Resolution is important when looking at flat panels because

they cannot adapt well to alternate resolutions the way CRTs do. The native

resolution of an LCD is the actual number of LCD pixels in the display.

Such monitors are sharp when running at their intended resolution, but look

terrible at other resolutions. So if the buyer has an application that is

designed to run at a specific resolution, then the LCD must be in that same

resolution. Logic might suggest that an LCD should be able to display lower

resolutions satisfactorily, but that isn't the case.

Resolution must not be considered apart from screen refresh rate. The

refresh rate is how many times per second the picture flickers. Refresh

too slowly, and the flicker becomes visible. Even when it isn't consciously

visible, it can be a problem by causing users to experience headaches and

fatigue. The minimum refresh rate is about 75 Hz, below which the screen

flicker will start to cause problems.


  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

  • Comment
    Pilot Class. The author and Barbie Flowers are first row third and second from right, respectively.

    How VA is disrupting tech delivery

    A former Digital Service specialist at the Department of Veterans Affairs explains efforts to transition government from a legacy "project" approach to a more user-centered "product" method.

  • Cloud
    cloud migration

    DHS cloud push comes with complications

    A pressing data center closure schedule and an ensuing scramble to move applications means that some Homeland Security components might need more than one hop to get to the cloud.

Stay Connected


Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.