Letter to the editor

As an agency information technology manager, I am strongly in favor of an

overall federal chief information officer. Standard policies and practices

throughout government must be centralized in one place. A committee of departmental

CIOs will not be able to accomplish this, as they all necessarily have their

own interests rather than what's good for the government as a whole.

A second reason I haven't heard mentioned is the varying degrees of competence

among departmental CIOs. The CIO of my department is not very well-respected

within the department because he is perceived as dictating from his "ivory

tower" — usually through publications — and does not work with departmental

IT staff. For example, in more than a year on the job, he has never met

with the IT heads of the departmental agencies as a group, even though this

group met quarterly before his arrival. He may be a fine fellow in person — I wouldn't know, as I've never met him — but as a CIO, he hasn't impressed

at all.

When a CIO is not too competent, who has the technical knowledge to know

he's not making good decisions? A departmental secretary and other departmental

mangers don't because IT is a field most of them know little about.

An overall federal CIO and his or her staff would have the technical background

to make a more informed assessment of a departmental CIO's actions, policies

and practices and could provide feedback to the CIO and to the CIO's management.

With an overall federal CIO, it's less likely that individual departments

will go astray just because the departmental CIO isn't as competent. So

a federal CIO is a must.

Name withheld upon request


We welcome your comments.

To send a letter to the editor, e-mail us at [email protected]. Please include your full name and a phone number for verification. We can withhold your name upon request.

Letters may be edited for clarity and for space constraints in the print version of FCW.


  • Veterans Affairs
    Blue Signage and logo of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

    VA health record go-live pushed back to July

    The Department of Veterans Affairs is delaying a planned initial deployment of its $16 billion electronic health record project by four months, but is promising added functionality at the go-live date.

  • Workforce
    The Pentagon (Photo by Ivan Cholakov / Shutterstock)

    Esper says he didn't seek the authority to gut DOD unions

    Defense Secretary Mark Esper told lawmakers he was waiting for a staff analysis of a recent presidential memo before deciding whether to leverage new authority.

Stay Connected


Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.