The necessity of networking

One of the most valuable aspects of the Year 2000 solution was the networking.

At every level of society, people got together, physically and online, to

talk about what they were doing to prepare for the date change and the dreaded

Year 2000 bug. Like the bug, networking cut across boundaries, drawing people

from every kind of organization.

Within the federal government, agency staff members and agency heads shared

information and cooperated with their counterparts in other agencies, ignoring

bureaucratic and turf boundaries. In the private sector, banks, airlines

and other industries followed suit, temporarily putting competition aside

to cooperate on a common problem.

Although the Year 2000 bug is no longer an issue, the successful technique

of using networking to share best practices and find common solutions should

continue. An online discussion group with occasional face-to-face meetings

can solve problems within and across organizations. Costs are small compared

with the size of the problems that can be tackled successfully. Four elements

are essential to success: incentives, interactivity, coordination and trust.

*Incentives. When participants see the benefits of being part of a network,

they will contribute ideas enthusiastically. Early substantive results — solutions to specific problems — are essential. Network organizers also

should recognize that membership on a dynamic cross-boundary team can be

a powerful contributor to employees' job satisfaction.

* Interactivity. A successful network stays active. Useful information

must flow regularly, with a balance struck between too much and too little

traffic in the online group. Moreover, the discussion flows should be useful

and organized — and solutions must flow from the interactions. The network

should not be permitted to become a forum for speechmaking.

* Coordination. A small team is needed to run an online group. Responsibilities

include maintaining the membership list and the Web site, moderating the

discussion to keep it on point, recognizing leaders and cultivating their

balanced participation, proposing the agenda, and keeping the results accessible.

Often the greatest hurdles are staffing and funding the facilitating group.

The easiest solution is to find a few deep-pocketed organizations that want

to solve a specific problem. Alternatively, fees can be collected from network


* Trust. Perhaps the quintessential element of success is trust among a

group's members. This begins with a network organizer with a reputation

for fairness and objectivity. The sponsorship of a large organization, such

as an association or committee, can also be very helpful.

Knowing who else is on the list makes information sharing easier because,

ultimately, trust comes from people working together. This is where a weakness

of our seductive electronic tools reveals itself: Periodic face-to-face

contact is essential to create and sustain trust. We're wired, but, thankfully,

we're still human.

—McConnell, former chief of information policy and technology at the Office

of Management and Budget and director of the International Y2K Cooperation

Center, is president of McConnell International LLC.


  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected


Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.