Letter to the Editor

As a government financial manager with a keen interest in computers and costs, I find another article about the "woes" of shortages of IT personnel and its solution (more money) to be laughable ["Survey reconfirms IT staffing woes," FCW, Sept. 4].

The top executive in Washington, D.C., and I am sure elsewhere, should really begin to look at what the IT staff is really doing. Executives should look at what the investment they are making really buys and ask whether is it the best use of their operating budgets.

How many of those IT employees are certified to do anything? What are the ratios of computer geeks to program personnel they support? How many IT personnel actually look for improvements through more cost-effective "best practices" (without any compromise in service)? My guess is very few, if my department is any indication. Turf protection is mission one! You use the word "router" to a top executive, and they prostrate themselves before the IT "gods"! Design a feeble Web page using FrontPage, and you are a "Webmaster"! All of this "expertise" is compensated at grades 13, 14 or 15!

I think that it is time these IT snake oil salesmen be uncovered for the sham they are perpetuating at the taxpayers' expense. (I do not wish to imply that all government IT folks are in this category.) Before the Office of Personnel Management starts offering special pay for these "critical" personnel, I think it is time to require [certifying] these employees if they want to be paid the big bucks. Let's start making sure we are getting the best and brightest.

I am all in favor of upward mobility, but the time of overpayments must stop! It is pretty bad when a former secretary with only a high school diploma who demonstrates minimal computer aptitude who knows "computerspeak" can make as much money or more than lawyers, nurses, Ph.D. holders, and other degreed professionals.

I'd say there is a workforce challenge here, but it requires more than just pay to resolve.

Ed Andersen

Washington, D.C.

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.

BY Ed Andersen
September 19, 2000

More Related Links

Featured

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

  • Comment
    Pilot Class. The author and Barbie Flowers are first row third and second from right, respectively.

    How VA is disrupting tech delivery

    A former Digital Service specialist at the Department of Veterans Affairs explains efforts to transition government from a legacy "project" approach to a more user-centered "product" method.

  • Cloud
    cloud migration

    DHS cloud push comes with complications

    A pressing data center closure schedule and an ensuing scramble to move applications means that some Homeland Security components might need more than one hop to get to the cloud.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.