Letter to the editor

In "The price of (near) perfection" [Federal Computer Week, Aug. 28, 2000], the chief information officer at Goddard Space Flight Center, Milton Halem, asked what it would cost to give Goddard's e-mail servers "99.999 percent" reliability.

I submit that no organization can reasonably justify the cost of providing a maximum of 5.526 seconds of downtime per year for e-mail. It's one thing to require perfection in heart valves and quite another for computer systems.

Instead of reaching for nirvana at taxpayer expense, NASA should first determine its real need for uptime and then look at options. The General Services Administration's advocacy of requirements analysis and analysis of alternatives is just common sense.

Victor H. Agresti

Senior Program Manager

Justice Department

WRITE US

We welcome your comments.

To send a letter to the editor, e-mail us at [email protected]. Please include your full name, title and a phone number for verification. We can withhold your name upon request.

Letters may be edited for clarity and for space constraints in the print version of FCW.

BY
October 03, 2000

More Related Links

Featured

  • Elections
    voting security

    'Unprecedented' challenges to safe, secure 2020 vote

    Our election infrastructure is bending under the stress of multiple crises. Administrators say they are doing all they can to ensure it doesn't break.

  • FCW Perspectives
    zero trust network

    Can government get to zero trust?

    Today's hybrid infrastructures and highly mobile workforces need the protection zero trust security can provide. Too bad there are obstacles at almost every turn.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.