Letter to the editor

I enjoyed your article on the pay raise "OPM details pay raise," Federal Computer Week, Dec. 11, 2000.

The Office of Personnel Management definitely missed the boat on what it finally gave out. I am a GS-0334-11 with 19 years in civil service. I have been waiting to see what the final result of this pay raise is, and I am very disappointed.

First, it took OPM three years to get this raise done. Second, I have seen college graduates start jobs with more pay than I currently make.

I would go so far as to say that I am insulted by OPM's final solution. I am not the only one that feels that way. They gave 33 percent to the entry-level workers and seven percent to those they supposedly want to retain. OPM should have given the IT workers a straight 33 percent pay raise.

I was considering staying in for another 10 years, but now I think it is time to go. Here are several reasons why:

  • Salary: I have been offered jobs "starting" at $20,000 more than what the U.S. government wants to pay me.
  • Overtime: Capped at GS-10 level. I have been earning roughly 10 to 40 hours each month due to manning problems. Why should I work OT for only $2 more an hour?
  • Hiring: (A) It takes too long for a government agency to decide. I put in for a GS-12 in July, and I have been told that it will take a few more months before they make a decision. I have been offered a civilian job in Japan, and they are ready to decide now. (B) There's no central site to research jobs. So far I have found 15 Web sites that carry government job listing and have separate application procedures. This is a big waste of time and resources.

I am coming to the point where I have to decide if I want to stay or leave civil service. Money is a big factor, and the U.S. government seems to want to not pay IT people what they are worth. I am 40 and have many good years ahead of me.

Harold P. Jensen Jr.,
computer specialist,
Support Center
Pacific Kadena Air Base, Japan


We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

  • Comment
    Pilot Class. The author and Barbie Flowers are first row third and second from right, respectively.

    How VA is disrupting tech delivery

    A former Digital Service specialist at the Department of Veterans Affairs explains efforts to transition government from a legacy "project" approach to a more user-centered "product" method.

  • Cloud
    cloud migration

    DHS cloud push comes with complications

    A pressing data center closure schedule and an ensuing scramble to move applications means that some Homeland Security components might need more than one hop to get to the cloud.

Stay Connected


Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.