Letter to the editor

The pay raise has now driven government agencies such as the Defense Finance and Accounting Service to re-grade the IT job announcements out there. They are grading them down to make them fit the old budgets!

Why didn't the government just re-grade the positions instead of giving a special raise? And what about those people whose jobs include all the knowledge, skills and abilities of a 334 but who are not 334s? That includes, for example: a 1001 (visual information specialty) who may be a systems administrator (automated information system or VI) or VI network administrator and manager.

Money is the issue! I have been in both the private and public sectors for more than 35 years and can tell you it's all about money. Cash in hand or benefits—it's all about money! Those who are willing to work for less and say it's not the money are just admitting they are not worth the money!

And then there are A-76 initiated reductions in force and IT recruiting! Go figure!

Danny Powell U.S. Army

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.

Featured

  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.