Courts hear online records debate

U.S. Courts officials mulled the suggestions of stakeholders on Friday as they consider how to balance the privacy of court records with the right to access them in the Internet age.

A subcommittee of the Judicial Conference of the United States — the policy-making arm of the courts — held a public hearing on the privacy and security implications of providing electronic public access to civil, criminal and other court case files.

More and more courts across the country are filing cases electronically, and the Internet enables them to make these files available at any time and from any location. The question is: What are the implications of providing this kind of access, and what restrictions — if any — should be put in place?

Members of the conference's Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files Subcommittee heard wide-ranging answers from public and private organizations. Representatives from the National Newspaper Association and Trial Lawyers for Public Justice, for instance, agreed that if a court file is available in paper form, it should also be made available in electronic form.

"The technology is irrelevant and a red herring in this issue," said Ken Allen, executive vice president and chief executive officer of the National Newspaper Association.

On the other hand, the Justice Department proposes — in the short-term — restricting full access to online files to those people who need to know, such as lawyers and law enforcement officials, until the issue is fully studied and a long-term approach ironed out.

Justice supports "appropriate extensive access in the long run," said Jonathan Meyer, deputy assistant attorney general in the department's Office of Policy Development. However, it's essential to "react quickly" to the immediate changes brought about by technology, Meyer said.

Judge John Lungstrum, chairman of the subcommittee, said he hopes to present the groups' recommendations at the Judicial Conference meeting in September.

Featured

  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.