Letter to the editor

James Wojciehowski's recent letter to the editor [FCW.com, April 9, 2001] is misleading.

There is no "battle" of "Wintel" vs. Apple on the embedded systems front. Neither operating system is suited for hard real-time applications or most field data acquisition applications.

The type of processor is picked to match the application, platform constraints and performance/comfort issues. Illogical biases against any hardware or software company because of market domination is a very poor reason to base a decision on which platform to use.

We use Microsoft Corp. products both on PCs and Macs, especially for administrative support. For networking or processing, we use Linux on Intel or SPARC CPUs. Most of our data acquisition systems are on the QNX operating system on Intel or [Advanced Micro Devices Inc.'s] Athlon CPUs.

We use and support what is cost-effective, what we are used to and what works.

Ronald Richter
Environmental Technology Laboratory
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.

Featured

  • FCW Perspectives
    remote workers (elenabsl/Shutterstock.com)

    Post-pandemic IT leadership

    The rush to maximum telework did more than showcase the importance of IT -- it also forced them to rethink their own operations.

  • Management
    shutterstock image By enzozo; photo ID: 319763930

    Where does the TMF Board go from here?

    With a $1 billion cash infusion, relaxed repayment guidelines and a surge in proposals from federal agencies, questions have been raised about whether the board overseeing the Technology Modernization Fund has been scaled to cope with its newfound popularity.

Stay Connected