Letter to the Editor

There were two concerns in giving the IT pay raise:

First, it sought to put introductory and intermediate federal positions on a somewhat better basis with respect to the private sector. A brand-new computer science graduate now commands $60,000 to $80,000. We lost on that one.

The other main concern was to avoid long-term costs by keeping retirement benefits down for Civil Service Retirement System employees. They are still almost 35 percent of the total. A dollar to the base for CSRS costs 1.6 to 2.0 times as much as a dollar for Federal Employees Retirement System in retirement benefits and more since the CSRS employee has fewer work years left to amortize the cost with production prior to retirement.

Take a look at the following table:

Got RaiseNo Raise
GS GradeGS 5-7GS-12GS 13-15
Percent Pay Raise33%7%0%
Percent FERS100% Less than 90%Less than 20%
Percent CSRS0% Greater than 15%Greater than 80%
Age Distribution80-90% Greater than 40 years old80%+ Less than 40 years

The chart is a guesstimate/estimated projection of the FERS/CSRS distribution and the age distribution with respect to the IT pay raise.

The estimates are based on reasonable assumptions and knowledge that the CSRS pay system is made up mostly of older employees (with the youngest now in their mid-30s), and I believe the above gives a good approximation of the situation.

It shows two things. First, most of the IT pay increase went to FERS employees. Second, most of the IT pay increase went to those who are under 40 years of age. While it is not illegal to exercise bias in pay administration toward FERS as opposed to CSRS, it is certainly unfair. And with regard to increasing the pay of those under 40 as opposed to those over 40, inadvertently of course, that is a matter that the courts would have to decide.

While the intent was probably only to minimize CSRS retirement benefits, the effect might be interpreted as de facto age discrimination.

Name withheld upon request


We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form. Civic.com readers, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


  • Veterans Affairs
    Veterans Affairs CIO Jim Gfrerer speaks at an Oct. 10 FCW event (Photo credit: Troy K. Schneider)

    VA's pivot to agile

    With 10 months on the job, Veterans Affairs CIO Jim Gfrerer is pushing his organization toward a culture of constant delivery.

  • Defense
    Dana Deasy, DOD Chief Information Officer, hosts a roundtable discussion on the enterprise cloud initiative with reporters, Aug. 9, 2019, at the Pentagon, Washington, D.C. (DoD photo by Air Force Staff Sgt. Andrew Carroll)

    DOD CIO 'very confident' that White House influence didn't guide JEDI award

    At his Senate confirmation hearing, Defense Department CIO Dana Deasy said the department's $10 billion cloud contract was awarded by a team of experts.

Stay Connected


Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.