Letter to the Editor

I read your article "IT job front remains critical" [Federal Computer Week, April 9, 2001], and I would like to point out another reason why the government cannot keep skilled information technology workers.

I will be leaving soon if my situation isn't resolved. I am a hard-working, 26-year-old, skilled IT government GS employee. (What the government wants right?) I made the mistake of transferring from a contracting career with an $80,000 to $100,000 salary to a government career with a $40,000 to $50,000 salary because of "great benefits and job stability."

I am working in Germany at the 98th Area Support Group Provost Marshal Office as the senior systems administrator for the ASG. Prior to accepting the GS position, I was a civilian contractor in Darmstadt, Germany and then a contractor in Kosovo for six months. I lived in a hotel for four months in Germany on temporary duty status, returned to the United States and then worked in Kosovo and lived in a shack, also on temporary duty status from the United States (with my company paying more than $15,000 extra per year for cost-of-living expenses).

Because I was in Kosovo when accepted for the GS position, I was classified as a local hire in Wuerzburg, Germany. I receive no housing allowance, no support from the housing office and cannot get furniture from housing all because I was living and working in Kosovo. After my Kosovo contract ended, I was required to return to the United States to outprocess from my company. I then had to pay for my ticket to go back to Germany for my new government job and pay $2,000 to ship my car. I still have not shipped my household goods from the United States because I cannot afford to right now. Therefore I have to live in a more expensive, fully furnished apartment because I cannot afford to buy more furniture, especially when I am paying for the storage of my household items in the United States. I am stuck.

I am getting married soon and because of the lack of support for housing, I barely have enough money to pay the bills and buy food for both of us. I am ashamed that I trusted the U.S. government to take care of its own employees. I was told that the housing allowance situation was in my favor when I accepted the job. I expected to get the allowance and get reimbursed for everything I had to pay, but later found I was probably not going to get it — all because I worked in Kosovo and was considered a local hire. Yeah, right. I have no property in Germany, no family, no residence (unless you consider a hotel a residence), nor had plans to do establish one. I have no attachments whatsoever to Europe.

My point is this: How can the government complain about retaining and hiring IT people when my (housing allowance) situation is very common. This is crazy! I will make sure that none of my friends or colleagues ever make the same mistake as me.

All I want is for the government to pay my living quarters allowance (LQA) as any company with employees overseas would, and I would make a long and successful career as a GS IT worker, for sure. The corporate sector would never do to its employees what I just went through. In fact I put my resume out three days ago [letter written on April 10] and got 12 job offers — all paying relocation expenses.

I was tricked into accepting this job and now have paid the consequences.

I have an appeal in for the LQA and should know soon. If I get denied, the government has just lost another skilled IT employee. How can I be a happy GS employee when I have to worry if I can afford rent and food? What gets me the most is everyone I talk to thinks I should get housing allowance — everyone except the final decision-makers.

Jeff Schafer
98th Area Support Group Provost Marshal Office


We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form. Civic.com readers, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


  • Workforce
    White House rainbow light shutterstock ID : 1130423963 By zhephotography

    White House rolls out DEIA strategy

    On Tuesday, the Biden administration issued agencies a roadmap to guide their efforts to develop strategic plans for diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility (DEIA), as required under a as required under a June executive order.

  • Defense
    software (whiteMocca/Shutterstock.com)

    Why DOD is so bad at buying software

    The Defense Department wants to acquire emerging technology faster and more efficiently. But will its latest attempts to streamline its processes be enough?

Stay Connected