These rules need a following

These are difficult times for the government's information super-highway. As the White House seems poised to forge full speed ahead with e-government initiatives, lawmakers want agencies to account for the information they gather in doing so.

Despite rules issued by the Office of Management and Budget last June directing agencies to stop secretly collecting visitor information from their Web sites, seven agencies operating 64 Web sites still use "persistent cookies," while dozens of others have yet to file reports. Persistent cookies are pieces of computer code planted on a user's computer by a Web site to track the user's movements.

There's no proof that this information is being used for nefarious purposes, but people still worry the government could use it to monitor individual activities. The government's insatiable appetite for personal data, irregular accounting for that data and the failure to post privacy policies on Web sites all have advocates and lawmakers poised for battle.

Advocates are pressing for a federal priv-acy chief, a post created by President Clinton and vacant since his administration ended. That might be a step in the right direction, but given the current administration's lack of enthusiasm for a federal chief information officer, support for a privacy czar may be long in coming.

That leaves privacy protection to the lawmakers. The Bush administration recently stood behind Clinton-era regul-ations to protect the privacy of medical records. And since the 107th Congress convened in January, more than 40 bills aimed at protecting citizens' privacy have been introduced.

As the demand — from citizens and the Bush administration — for online governmental services increases, it's imperative that those interactions are adequately protected.

A wired government was supposed to bring people closer to lawmakers, and thus make public officials more respons-ive. Those who suggest the privacy purists "vote with their mouse" and get off the Internet are missing the point.

A disenfranchised public is all too willing to tune out. Let's not encourage them to log off as well.

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form. Civic.com readers, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


Featured

  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.