Letter to the Editor

Regarding Mail Zall's "Pay parity" column in the April 9, Federal Computer Week: I agree with his general concerns about the different treatments in retention approaches for federal civilian and military personnel, but there is one key distinction between the two not mentioned in the column.

All military people, at least in theory, are required to place their lives on the line if necessary. Even stateside support personnel may be assigned to duties in war zones and, in extreme conditions, even the cook may have to be in combat.

Also, military personnel are subject to a different legal system than civilians and have limited rights compared to civilians.

This is not to undermine Mr. Zall's point. I did want to make sure, however, that those aspects of military life don't get neglected.

J.D. Abolins

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form. Civic.com readers, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


Featured

  • Elections
    voting security

    'Unprecedented' challenges to safe, secure 2020 vote

    Our election infrastructure is bending under the stress of multiple crises. Administrators say they are doing all they can to ensure it doesn't break.

  • FCW Perspectives
    zero trust network

    Can government get to zero trust?

    Today's hybrid infrastructures and highly mobile workforces need the protection zero trust security can provide. Too bad there are obstacles at almost every turn.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.