Letter to the Editor

Regarding Mail Zall's "Pay parity" column in the April 9, Federal Computer Week: I agree with his general concerns about the different treatments in retention approaches for federal civilian and military personnel, but there is one key distinction between the two not mentioned in the column.

All military people, at least in theory, are required to place their lives on the line if necessary. Even stateside support personnel may be assigned to duties in war zones and, in extreme conditions, even the cook may have to be in combat.

Also, military personnel are subject to a different legal system than civilians and have limited rights compared to civilians.

This is not to undermine Mr. Zall's point. I did want to make sure, however, that those aspects of military life don't get neglected.

J.D. Abolins

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form. Civic.com readers, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


Featured

  • Comment
    customer experience (garagestock/Shutterstock.com)

    Leveraging the TMF to improve customer experience

    Focusing on customer experience as part of the Technology Modernization Fund investment strategy will enable agencies to improve service and build trust in government.

  • FCW Perspectives
    zero trust network

    Why zero trust is having a moment

    Improved technologies and growing threats have agencies actively pursuing dynamic and context-driven security.

Stay Connected