Letter to the Editor

Regarding Mail Zall's "Pay parity" column in the April 9, Federal Computer Week: I agree with his general concerns about the different treatments in retention approaches for federal civilian and military personnel, but there is one key distinction between the two not mentioned in the column.

All military people, at least in theory, are required to place their lives on the line if necessary. Even stateside support personnel may be assigned to duties in war zones and, in extreme conditions, even the cook may have to be in combat.

Also, military personnel are subject to a different legal system than civilians and have limited rights compared to civilians.

This is not to undermine Mr. Zall's point. I did want to make sure, however, that those aspects of military life don't get neglected.

J.D. Abolins

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form. Civic.com readers, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


Featured

  • FCW Perspectives
    tech process (pkproject/Shutterstock.com)

    Understanding the obstacles to automation

    As RPA moves from buzzword to practical applications, agency leaders say it’s forcing broader discussions about business operations

  • Federal 100 Awards
    Federal 100 logo

    Fed 100 nominations are now open

    Help us identify this year's outstanding individuals in federal IT.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.