Letter to the Editor

In my agency, many workers classified as "computer specialists" actually perform work as contract specialists, contract monitors, procurement agents, etc. Their involvement with computers and information technology is indirect at best (Web browsing and using e-mail).

My understanding of the purpose of the IT pay raise was to reward computer programmers, system administrators and others who have gone through the painstaking curriculum/experience needed to design and write software and configure, install, and maintain computer systems and networks, etc. — that is, the folks that actually make IT happen.

These are the workers that are difficult to replace; their backgrounds in math, science and computer programming are attracting fewer and fewer students because of relative difficulty of the course work.

I am a GS-13 with a bachelor of science in math and a master's degree in math and computer science, and I serve as a systems analyst/administrator/programmer. It is irritating to see GS-12 Step 10 contract monitors earning more than me because of an IT pay raise that shotgunned money to many who were never intended to receive it.

The spirit of the IT pay raise was noble, but the implementation fell well short of the mark.

Name withheld upon request

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form. Civic.com readers, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


Featured

  • Federal 100 Awards
    Federal 100 logo

    Nominations for the 2021 Fed 100 are now being accepted

    The deadline for submissions is Dec. 31.

  • Government Innovation Awards
    Government Innovation Awards - https://governmentinnovationawards.com

    Congratulations to the 2020 Rising Stars

    These early-career leaders already are having an outsized impact on government IT.

Stay Connected