Letter to the Editor

There have been a number of letters discussing why the military should get paid more. Almost all cite the risk. [See the letters archive under Milt Zall's "Pay parity" column.]

True, military service is dangerous, but is not the only dangerous profession in the federal government. Federal firefighters and law enforcement officers face risk daily, not just when Congress declares war.

The Forest Service has tree fellers. Check the injury and fatality rates: Tree-felling is more hazardous than infantry combat. To set pay rates on the basis of perceived danger alone and ignoring other factors is ludicrous.

Name withheld upon request

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form. Civic.com readers, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


Featured

  • Defense
    The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) reveal concept renderings for the Next NGA West (N2W) campus from the design-build team McCarthy HITT winning proposal. The entirety of the campus is anticipated to be operational in 2025.

    How NGA is tackling interoperability challenges

    Mark Munsell, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency’s CTO, talks about talent shortages and how the agency is working to get more unclassified data.

  • Veterans Affairs
    Veterans Affairs CIO Jim Gfrerer speaks at an Oct. 10 FCW event (Photo credit: Troy K. Schneider)

    VA's pivot to agile

    With 10 months on the job, Veterans Affairs CIO Jim Gfrerer is pushing his organization toward a culture of constant delivery.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.