Letter to the Editor

There have been a number of letters discussing why the military should get paid more. Almost all cite the risk. [See the letters archive under Milt Zall's "Pay parity" column.]

True, military service is dangerous, but is not the only dangerous profession in the federal government. Federal firefighters and law enforcement officers face risk daily, not just when Congress declares war.

The Forest Service has tree fellers. Check the injury and fatality rates: Tree-felling is more hazardous than infantry combat. To set pay rates on the basis of perceived danger alone and ignoring other factors is ludicrous.

Name withheld upon request

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form. Civic.com readers, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


Featured

  • Workforce
    coronavirus molecule (creativeneko/Shutterstock.com)

    OMB urges 'maximum telework flexibilities' for DC-area feds

    A Sunday evening memo ahead of a potentially chaotic commute urges agency heads to pivot to telework as much as possible.

  • Acquisition
    Shutterstock ID: 1993681 By Jurgen Ziewe

    Spinning up telework presents procurement challenges

    As concerns over the coronavirus outbreak drives more agencies towards expanding employee telework, federal acquisition contracts can help ease some of the pain.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.