Letter to the editor

I'm a supervisor. Regarding the rule of three — Milt Zall is completely off his rocker. ["Keep the rule of three," Federal Computer Week, March 26, 2001.]

I have had cases where equally ranked candidates were excluded from consideration because of the mind-numbing algorithm that uses the candidate's Social Security number along with the day of the week that the personnel staffer is doing the rankings.

Where else but the nuttiest kind of bureaucracy would something as arbitrary as a "rule of three" be deemed more important than (a) fairly giving all candidates of equal ranking an opportunity to interview for the job and (b) letting the selecting official choose from all the equally qualified applicants?

Galen Tromble

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form. Civic.com readers, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


Featured

  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.