Letter to the editor

I'm a supervisor. Regarding the rule of three — Milt Zall is completely off his rocker. ["Keep the rule of three," Federal Computer Week, March 26, 2001.]

I have had cases where equally ranked candidates were excluded from consideration because of the mind-numbing algorithm that uses the candidate's Social Security number along with the day of the week that the personnel staffer is doing the rankings.

Where else but the nuttiest kind of bureaucracy would something as arbitrary as a "rule of three" be deemed more important than (a) fairly giving all candidates of equal ranking an opportunity to interview for the job and (b) letting the selecting official choose from all the equally qualified applicants?

Galen Tromble

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form. Civic.com readers, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


Featured

  • Government Innovation Awards
    Government Innovation Awards - https://governmentinnovationawards.com

    Congratulations to the 2020 Rising Stars

    These early-career leaders already are having an outsized impact on government IT.

  • Cybersecurity
    cybersecurity (Rawpixel/Shutterstock.com)

    CMMC clears key regulatory hurdle

    The White House approved an interim rule to mandate defense contractors prove they adhere to existing cybersecurity standards from the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Stay Connected