Letter to the editor

I'm a supervisor. Regarding the rule of three — Milt Zall is completely off his rocker. ["Keep the rule of three," Federal Computer Week, March 26, 2001.]

I have had cases where equally ranked candidates were excluded from consideration because of the mind-numbing algorithm that uses the candidate's Social Security number along with the day of the week that the personnel staffer is doing the rankings.

Where else but the nuttiest kind of bureaucracy would something as arbitrary as a "rule of three" be deemed more important than (a) fairly giving all candidates of equal ranking an opportunity to interview for the job and (b) letting the selecting official choose from all the equally qualified applicants?

Galen Tromble

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form. Civic.com readers, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


Featured

  • Veterans Affairs
    Blue Signage and logo of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

    VA health record go-live pushed back to July

    The Department of Veterans Affairs is delaying a planned initial deployment of its $16 billion electronic health record project by four months, but is promising added functionality at the go-live date.

  • Workforce
    The Pentagon (Photo by Ivan Cholakov / Shutterstock)

    Esper says he didn't seek the authority to gut DOD unions

    Defense Secretary Mark Esper told lawmakers he was waiting for a staff analysis of a recent presidential memo before deciding whether to leverage new authority.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.