Letter to the editor

I'm a supervisor. Regarding the rule of three — Milt Zall is completely off his rocker. ["Keep the rule of three," Federal Computer Week, March 26, 2001.]

I have had cases where equally ranked candidates were excluded from consideration because of the mind-numbing algorithm that uses the candidate's Social Security number along with the day of the week that the personnel staffer is doing the rankings.

Where else but the nuttiest kind of bureaucracy would something as arbitrary as a "rule of three" be deemed more important than (a) fairly giving all candidates of equal ranking an opportunity to interview for the job and (b) letting the selecting official choose from all the equally qualified applicants?

Galen Tromble

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form. Civic.com readers, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


Featured

  • Acquisition
    Shutterstock ID 169474442 By Maxx-Studio

    The growing importance of GWACs

    One of the government's most popular methods for buying emerging technologies and critical IT services faces significant challenges in an ever-changing marketplace

  • Workforce
    Shutterstock image 1658927440 By Deliris masks in office coronavirus covid19

    White House orders federal contractors vaccinated by Dec. 8

    New COVID-19 guidance directs federal contractors and subcontractors to make sure their employees are vaccinated — the latest in a series of new vaccine requirements the White House has been rolling out in recent weeks.

Stay Connected