Letter to the Editor

FCW has published many articles about NMCI, the new outsourcing IT effort in the Navy, but always in a positive light.

There are so many negative issues with this contract — why aren't there more articles discussing the negative aspects of this contract? If you keep printing a positive spin to this effort, your readers may get the illusion this is a good contract, when in my view, we are headed for the cliff.

The high-tech users in our technology labs are being traumatized. At my facility, the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, the government was not allowed to compete against the proposed contractor, now Electronic Data Systems Corp. This gives the perception of unfair labor practices. Given the chance, this facility might have been able to underbid EDS for IT services by a wide margin.

I, for one, am not a lemming.

Name withheld upon request

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form. Civic.com readers, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


Featured

  • Defense
    Soldiers from the Old Guard test the second iteration of the Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS) capability set during an exercise at Fort Belvoir, VA in Fall 2019. Photo by Courtney Bacon

    IVAS and the future of defense acquisition

    The Army’s Integrated Visual Augmentation System has been in the works for years, but the potentially multibillion deal could mark a paradigm shift in how the Defense Department buys and leverages technology.

  • Cybersecurity
    Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas  (U.S. Coast Guard photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Lora Ratliff)

    Mayorkas announces cyber 'sprints' on ransomware, ICS, workforce

    The Homeland Security secretary announced a series of focused efforts to address issues around ransomware, critical infrastructure and the agency's workforce that will all be launched in the coming weeks.

Stay Connected