Letter to the Editor

FCW has published many articles about NMCI, the new outsourcing IT effort in the Navy, but always in a positive light.

There are so many negative issues with this contract — why aren't there more articles discussing the negative aspects of this contract? If you keep printing a positive spin to this effort, your readers may get the illusion this is a good contract, when in my view, we are headed for the cliff.

The high-tech users in our technology labs are being traumatized. At my facility, the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, the government was not allowed to compete against the proposed contractor, now Electronic Data Systems Corp. This gives the perception of unfair labor practices. Given the chance, this facility might have been able to underbid EDS for IT services by a wide margin.

I, for one, am not a lemming.

Name withheld upon request

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form. Civic.com readers, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


Featured

  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.