Letter to the Editor

It has been interesting to me to read this series of disagreements over military/civilian pay parity.

Those in the military act as if their pay will somehow be reduced if the civilians receive more. That isn't the case at all. The pay increase for the military has already been set at 4.6 percent. Why begrudge the civilians receiving a fair pay raise?

Because most of the civilian workforce in the defense agencies is made up of retired or former military (the Veterans' Preference System works very well), I'm surprised that the military readers seem so bound to reduce what is highly likely to be their next career field. That seems somewhat shortsighted.

Additionally, someone said that civilians work for the military [Letter to the Editor, May 23, 2001]. Hmm, last I looked at the organizational chart, there were several civilians at the top of the executive branch.

We all work to defend our nation. Let us stop bickering over who is worth more.

Marsha Roepe
Defense Contract Management Agency

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form. Civic.com readers, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


Featured

  • Workforce
    coronavirus molecule (creativeneko/Shutterstock.com)

    OMB urges 'maximum telework flexibilities' for DC-area feds

    A Sunday evening memo ahead of a potentially chaotic commute urges agency heads to pivot to telework as much as possible.

  • Acquisition
    Shutterstock ID: 1993681 By Jurgen Ziewe

    Spinning up telework presents procurement challenges

    As concerns over the coronavirus outbreak drives more agencies towards expanding employee telework, federal acquisition contracts can help ease some of the pain.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.