Report bolsters limited NMCI testing

Additional testing of the Navy Marine Corps Intranet will not provide extra assurances and will have significant costs, according to a new report from the Center for Naval Analyses.

The report boosts the Navy's contention that NMCI should be allowed to use commercial testing procedures rather than treating the project as a weapons system, as Pentagon officials have argued. The latter would require a more onerous testing procedure.

"The most reasonable course of action at this point is to lift the strategic pause and proceed with the deployment of NMCI," according to the CNA report.

The testing decision has significant financial ramifications — potentially costing the Navy $728 million in fiscal 2002.

The decision about testing will determine whether the project can move beyond the congressionally mandated "strategic pause." Lawmakers stipulated that Defense Department officials sign off on the Navy's NMCI testing and certification. Linton Wells II, the Defense Department's acting chief information officer, would have to sign off on the decision to lift the strategic pause, and he has suggested that NMCI undergo the more rigorous weapons systems testing.

CNA's risk assessment of the NMCI strategic pause, requested by the chief of naval operations, warned that further delay in lifting the strategic pause will be increasingly costly and is not likely to produce significant benefits.

"The costs of delaying the NMCI deployment until later in [fiscal 2002] are substantial and increase with the time delayed," according to the report, "Preliminary Risk Assessment of the Navy Marine Corps Intranet Strategic Pause." The technical performance risks are low, and while the operational performance issues are less clear, they will remain unclear well into fiscal 2002.

"The NMCI contract was structured to shift the responsibility — and risk — of the cost and performance of NMCI from the [Navy] to a commercial contractor," the report states. Extending the strategic pause into fiscal 2002, however, has the unintended effect of transferring much of NMCI's risk back to the government.

The report says the Navy has four options:

* Continue with the strategic pause. That option would allow for full testing of NMCI, but the Navy would have to pay EDS $728 million in fiscal 2002. If the pause continues, some fraction of those funds will be wasted.

* Lift the strategic pause. There would be no additional cost or schedule risks beyond the risks inherent in the project itself, according to CNA. This option would not address the Pentagon's concerns about testing.

* Limit the strategic pause. NMCI could proceed to some degree while testing continues. The risks to NMCI's schedule depends on the size and timing of the second funding allocation, according to CNA.

* Terminate the NMCI contract. The cost of this option could be very high. EDS would be entitled to recover as much as $84.5 million in additional costs, and it is likely the vendor would seek to recover all of its costs, currently more than $1 billion. Furthermore, the Navy would face additional costs to rebuild its existing infrastructure.

CNA recommended lifting the strategic pause and letting the NMCI project proceed.

About the Author

Christopher J. Dorobek is the co-anchor of Federal News Radio’s afternoon drive program, The Daily Debrief with Chris Dorobek and Amy Morris, and the founder, publisher and editor of the, a leading blog for the Federal IT community.

Dorobek joined Federal News Radio in 2008 with 16 years of experience covering government issues with an emphasis on government information technology. Prior to joining Federal News Radio, Dorobek was editor-in-chief of Federal Computer Week, the leading news magazine for government IT decision-makers and the flagship of the 1105 Government Information Group portfolio of publications. As editor-in-chief, Dorobek served as a member of the senior leadership team at 1105 Government Information Group, providing daily editorial direction and management for FCW magazine,, Government Health IT and its other editorial products.

Dorobek joined FCW in 2001 as a senior reporter and assumed increasing responsibilities, becoming managing editor and executive editor before being named editor-in-chief in 2006. Prior to joining FCW, Dorobek was a technology reporter at, one of the first online community centers for current and former government employees. He also spent five years at Government Computer News, another leading industry publication, covering a variety of federal IT-related issues.

Dorobek is a frequent speaker on issues involving the government IT industry, and has appeared as a frequent contributor to NewsChannel 8’s Federal News Today program. He began his career as a reporter at the Foster’s Daily Democrat, a daily newspaper in Dover, N.H. He is a graduate of the University of Southern California. He lives in Washington, DC.


  • Management
    shutterstock image By enzozo; photo ID: 319763930

    Where does the TMF Board go from here?

    With a $1 billion cash infusion, relaxed repayment guidelines and a surge in proposals from federal agencies, questions have been raised about whether the board overseeing the Technology Modernization Fund has been scaled to cope with its newfound popularity.

  • IT Modernization
    shutterstock image By enzozo; photo ID: 319763930

    OMB provides key guidance for TMF proposals amid surge in submissions

    Deputy Federal CIO Maria Roat details what makes for a winning Technology Modernization Fund proposal as agencies continue to submit major IT projects for potential funding.

Stay Connected