U.S. courts may put more case records online

U.S. courts may put more case records online

A committee of federal judges this week recommended posting most federal court case files online, with some restrictions.

Social Security cases should be excluded, the judges said, because they often involve disability claims with medical records. Personal identifiers such as Social Security numbers, birthdates, financial account numbers and minors’ names should be removed or modified, they said.

The judges did not recommend placing any criminal case files online, citing safety and law enforcement risks.

Dial-up access is already available for some case data through the Public Access to Court Electronic Records system, which carries a 7-cent-per-page fee; each court maintains its individual PACER database. Online files would also be available for free at public terminals at courthouses.

The full Judicial Conference will consider the report at its Sept. 11 meeting. The proposal can be viewed at www.uscourts.gov/Press_Releases/att81501.pdf.

About the Author

Connect with the GCN staff on Twitter @GCNtech.

Featured

  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.