Fair and open job postings?

Under the merit system principles that govern the recruitment of federal employees, recruitment should be fair and open. Public notice of available jobs is central to meeting this expectation, yet finding out about a job opening these days can still be quite a challenge.

When the Office of Personnel Management conducted a review in 1997, it found that almost one-third of the personnel actions requiring public notice were not posted as required. Although you may find that hard to believe, it's true. So OPM recently decided to take another look at the issue.

OPM said it was "pleased to note that positive significant change occurred" between its 1997 and 1999 study findings. "At the same time, the study findings indicate that agencies need to continue their improvement efforts."

Now as best I can tell, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to understand that job vacancies have to be posted so that qualified applicants can apply. Yet part of the problem seems to be that many agencies told OPM that they did not understand the requirements to announce job vacancies on USA Jobs.

It's unclear why OPM is pleased at all about the results from its most recent review. Instead of failing to properly post one-third of all vacancies in 1997, the failure rate is now one-fourth of all vacancies, OPM found. This is not a statistic that should make agencies or OPM proud. If jobs aren't being posted, agencies are missing out on a potentially large pool of qualified applicants. Whatever happened to full and open competition?

Back in 1997, the Defense Department was only posting 51 percent of its job vacancies, and now it's up to 69 percent. In my view, that's still awful. But OPM gives DOD credit, saying it "showed significant improvement, announcing vacancies on USA Jobs for 69 percent of their [fiscal ] 1999 hiring actions. This is an increase of 18 percentage points over its lower [fiscal] 1997 figure of 51 percent."

Talk about putting a positive spin on events. Makes you wonder if the person at OPM who wrote this report is letting DOD off too easily.

At least OPM recognizes that despite the small improvements, "some agency installations still do not fully understand their responsibilities and the requirements in providing public notice." OPM plans to continue to improve guidance, monitor compliance and emphasize the importance of public notice of job openings, officials said. Well, they should.

Because feds are the victims and the perpetrators of this gross disregard for rules and regulations, it's unclear whether there is a sense of urgency about this problem. Who cares whether feds are given a fair opportunity to apply for government jobs? OPM? Congress? The White House? Shouldn't we all?

Zall is a retired federal employee who since 1987 has written the Bureaucratus column for Federal Computer Week. He can be reached at miltzall@qis.net.


  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected


Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.