Letter to the editor

I enjoy reading Milt Zall's column in Federal Computer Week. As a fairly recently retired federal government worker, though, I have a somewhat different take on the retirement issue that he wrote about in the Aug. 13 issue ["Why feds retire"].

In my opinion, one of the problems the government has is that too many employees are staying too long in their jobs and not retiring.

From my observation, most feds over 55 years old are past their prime and would do the country a big service by checking out and making way for newer blood. And the fact that they continue to work, even though many are actually receiving only 25 to 35 cents on the dollar, when considering what they would receive in retirement pay, shows that they are "in a rut."

I do not buy any argument that they stay in their jobs as a "public service." Quite to the contrary, I believe it is a "public disservice."

This is especially true for grades 14-15 and the Senior Executive Service rank, where too many older workers hang on just to improve their "high-three years."

And I emphatically disagree that feds are underpaid. Most could not get anywhere close to their government salary on the open market. The ones who are truly overworked are in most cases the result of manufactured work passed down from "over-the-hill" senior executives.

My experience was in the departments of Defense, Labor, Health and Human Services, Interior, and the Office of Economic Opportunity and includes a tour with NATO in Brussels as a senior-level civilian.

Fred Hammer
Parker, Colo.

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.

Featured

  • Workforce
    White House rainbow light shutterstock ID : 1130423963 By zhephotography

    White House rolls out DEIA strategy

    On Tuesday, the Biden administration issued agencies a roadmap to guide their efforts to develop strategic plans for diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility (DEIA), as required under a as required under a June executive order.

  • Defense
    software (whiteMocca/Shutterstock.com)

    Why DOD is so bad at buying software

    The Defense Department wants to acquire emerging technology faster and more efficiently. But will its latest attempts to streamline its processes be enough?

Stay Connected