Letter to the editor

If the information technology pay supplement is allowed to stand as implemented, each new promotion from an IT GS-12 to a GS-13 will continue to leapfrog past GS-13s and higher who were promoted earlier but who were denied the supplement. (The difference is as much as four steps and $8,400 a year, 11 years' worth of step increases, more than $54,000 in pay during those 11 years.)

The huge flaw in this process is that GS-13s and above were denied the supplement, but GS-12s who receive the supplement are allowed to take it with them when they are promoted, and they will have it for the rest of their careers.

Those of us who were denied the supplement have been sentenced to finishing out our careers watching our junior co-workers slide past us one by one.

How do you suppose this is affecting the morale and motivation of the very people who are supposed to be leading the federal government's IT into the 21st century?

Name withheld by request

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.

Featured

  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.