Letter to the editor

I have very much enjoyed Milt Zall's columns over the years, but there is something amiss regarding the new crescendo toward making airport screeners federal employees ["More feds, not fewer," Federal Computer Week, Oct. 15, 2001].

I am currently located at an overseas air base, and the air terminal is operated by the U.S. Air Force. It is most interesting that the airport screeners here are not federal employees; the Air Force let a contract to go private less than six months ago.

Since A-76 states that no "inherently governmental" function can be performed by nongovernment employees, this contract appears to mean that, at the very least, the Air Force has no heartburn stating that airport screening is not inherently governmental.

As for my personal opinion, there are dedicated workers in both the civilian and the government world. There are also limitations inherent in both worlds that will sometimes be at odds with retaining and motivating dedicated workers.

Kevin Burns

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.

Featured

  • Acquisition
    network monitoring (nmedia/Shutterstock.com)

    How companies should prep for CMMC

    Defense contractors should be getting ready for the Defense Department's impending cybersecurity standard expected to be released this month.

  • Workforce
    Volcanic Tablelands Calif BLM Bishop Field Office employee. April 28, 2010

    BLM begins move out of Washington

    The decision to relocate staff could disrupt key relationships with Congress and OMB and set the stage for a dismantling of the agency, say former employees.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.