Letter to the editor

I have very much enjoyed Milt Zall's columns over the years, but there is something amiss regarding the new crescendo toward making airport screeners federal employees ["More feds, not fewer," Federal Computer Week, Oct. 15, 2001].

I am currently located at an overseas air base, and the air terminal is operated by the U.S. Air Force. It is most interesting that the airport screeners here are not federal employees; the Air Force let a contract to go private less than six months ago.

Since A-76 states that no "inherently governmental" function can be performed by nongovernment employees, this contract appears to mean that, at the very least, the Air Force has no heartburn stating that airport screening is not inherently governmental.

As for my personal opinion, there are dedicated workers in both the civilian and the government world. There are also limitations inherent in both worlds that will sometimes be at odds with retaining and motivating dedicated workers.

Kevin Burns

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.

Featured

  • Workforce
    Avril Haines testifies SSCI Jan. 19, 2021

    Haines looks to restore IC workforce morale

    If confirmed, Avril Haines says that one of her top priorities as the Director of National Intelligence will be "institutional" issues, like renewing public trust in the intelligence community and improving workforce morale.

  • Defense
    laptop cloud concept (Andrey Suslov/Shutterstock.com)

    Telework, BYOD and DEOS

    Telework made the idea of bringing your own device a top priority as the Defense Information Systems Agency begins transitioning to a permanent version of the commercial virtual remote environment.

Stay Connected