Letter to the editor

This is in regard to Milt Zall's Bureaucratus column in the Sept. 17 Federal Computer Week, "Fair and open job postings?"

His point is well-meant and well-taken. However, he misses a major point — that the majority of "open" positions are wired, that is someone is ID'd for the position prior to posting, announcing, etc. Therefore, a qualified candidate who is not in the "good old boy" network has no chance to get a position when it's posted.

Therefore, I submit that the posting of vacancies does not improve the candidate pool. Posting vacancies only makes the bureaucrats feel good and gives them the excuse to use when someone complains that they tried for a position but didn't receive the time of day.

Now everyone is happy, but posting 100 percent of openings does not ensure that the best-qualified person is hired.

Joe Takacs
Project supervisor

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.

Featured

  • Government Innovation Awards
    Government Innovation Awards - https://governmentinnovationawards.com

    Congratulations to the 2020 Rising Stars

    These early-career leaders already are having an outsized impact on government IT.

  • Cybersecurity
    cybersecurity (Rawpixel/Shutterstock.com)

    CMMC clears key regulatory hurdle

    The White House approved an interim rule to mandate defense contractors prove they adhere to existing cybersecurity standards from the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Stay Connected