Letter to the editor

This is in regard to Milt Zall's Bureaucratus column in the Sept. 17 Federal Computer Week, "Fair and open job postings?"

His point is well-meant and well-taken. However, he misses a major point — that the majority of "open" positions are wired, that is someone is ID'd for the position prior to posting, announcing, etc. Therefore, a qualified candidate who is not in the "good old boy" network has no chance to get a position when it's posted.

Therefore, I submit that the posting of vacancies does not improve the candidate pool. Posting vacancies only makes the bureaucrats feel good and gives them the excuse to use when someone complains that they tried for a position but didn't receive the time of day.

Now everyone is happy, but posting 100 percent of openings does not ensure that the best-qualified person is hired.

Joe Takacs
Project supervisor

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.

Featured

  • Comment
    customer experience (garagestock/Shutterstock.com)

    Leveraging the TMF to improve customer experience

    Focusing on customer experience as part of the Technology Modernization Fund investment strategy will enable agencies to improve service and build trust in government.

  • FCW Perspectives
    zero trust network

    Why zero trust is having a moment

    Improved technologies and growing threats have agencies actively pursuing dynamic and context-driven security.

Stay Connected