Letter to the editor

This is in regard to Milt Zall's Bureaucratus column in the Sept. 17 Federal Computer Week, "Fair and open job postings?"

His point is well-meant and well-taken. However, he misses a major point — that the majority of "open" positions are wired, that is someone is ID'd for the position prior to posting, announcing, etc. Therefore, a qualified candidate who is not in the "good old boy" network has no chance to get a position when it's posted.

Therefore, I submit that the posting of vacancies does not improve the candidate pool. Posting vacancies only makes the bureaucrats feel good and gives them the excuse to use when someone complains that they tried for a position but didn't receive the time of day.

Now everyone is happy, but posting 100 percent of openings does not ensure that the best-qualified person is hired.

Joe Takacs
Project supervisor

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.

Featured

  • Workforce
    Shutterstock image 1658927440 By Deliris masks in office coronavirus covid19

    White House orders federal contractors vaccinated by Dec. 8

    New COVID-19 guidance directs federal contractors and subcontractors to make sure their employees are vaccinated — the latest in a series of new vaccine requirements the White House has been rolling out in recent weeks.

  • FCW Perspectives
    remote workers (elenabsl/Shutterstock.com)

    Post-pandemic IT leadership

    The rush to maximum telework did more than showcase the importance of IT -- it also forced them to rethink their own operations.

Stay Connected