Letter to the editor

I wanted to respond to a recent letter to the editor titled "Grasping the concept of GovNet." In his letter, Mr. Alan Girvan stated that everyone should be helping the government get this project off the ground. He went on further, stating that many senior managers see this as a "cash cow."

What I would like to say is that GovNet is just another layer of bureaucracy that President Bush's cyberspace security adviser, Richard Clarke, wants to establish, rather than looking at what is currently available for the job! Has anyone heard of NIPRNET [Non-Classified Internet Protocol Router Network]?

This network was designed for exactly what Mr. Clarke proposes. The government let the original intent get away from them by allowing all kinds of interconnections that were never intended. Let's get rid of all the backdoors to NIPRNET, and you will have GovNet!

Rick Aleshire

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.

Featured

  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.