Letter to the editor

Following are responses to an FCW.com poll question that asked, "Does a consulting firm lose its objectivity if it's owned by a product manufacturer?"

As a project manager in the Air Force for many years and several years in the civilian sector, I have found that the sad fact is that consultants who work for companies who also do production almost never give you the true unbiased guidance that you are seeking.

More than 95 percent of the time, those consultants tried to steer me to their own companies products as the "ultimate solution," even when, to an unbiased observer, that was definitely not the best alternative.

Gale Hamilton U.S. Air Force, retired

***

If a consulting firm owned by IBM Corp. was allowed to recommend IBM solutions, then it's objectivity would certainly be in question. If it were not allowed to do so, then why would IBM purchase it for the big bucks?

Name withheld by request

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.

Featured

  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.