Letter to the editor

Following is a response to an FCW.com poll question that asked, "Would the creation of a Cabinet-level department strengthen homeland security-related IT initiatives?"

My vote was yes. And the most compelling reason I can think of is that, while we are tightening security across our land and the Office of Homeland Security is working to that end, there is a great deal of overkill in many security measures.

I'm sure most people have seen it. From the length of time it takes to get on a plane now to the entering of federal and state office buildings, with still no assurance that terrorist acts won't be accomplished.

The Office of Homeland Security needs to be cabinet-level so there can be more accountability and veto authority. In addition, the director(s) should be confirmed by the Senate so that the government order of checks and balances can be reached and maintained.

Keep up the good work, Mr. President. But share the responsibility of homeland security with the other branches of government.

Richard Vaughn Disability Determination for Social Security Administration

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.

Featured

  • IT Modernization
    shutterstock image By enzozo; photo ID: 319763930

    OMB provides key guidance for TMF proposals amid surge in submissions

    Deputy Federal CIO Maria Roat details what makes for a winning Technology Modernization Fund proposal as agencies continue to submit major IT projects for potential funding.

  • gears and money (zaozaa19/Shutterstock.com)

    Worries from a Democrat about the Biden administration and federal procurement

    Steve Kelman is concerned that the push for more spending with small disadvantaged businesses will detract from the goal of getting the best deal for agencies and taxpayers.

Stay Connected