Personnel a question in A-76 policy

Circular A-76

As agencies and industry await the Office of Management and Budget's proposed revisions to Circular A-76 — which covers the process for competing government services with the private sector — an overriding concern is whether agencies have the personnel to compete or to oversee outsourced functions.

OMB's Office of Federal Procurement Policy plans to release in October the revisions to Circular A-76 that were developed by an interagency working group, Angela Styles, administrator of OFPP testified before the House Government Reform Committee's Technology and Procurement Policy Subcommittee on Sept. 27.

However, regardless of the revisions, agencies are concerned that they may not have the resources or expertise to be able to compete for functions — especially in information technology — much less oversee those functions if they are contracted out, said Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.), chairman of the subcommittee.

The A-76 revisions will follow closely the recommendations released this year by the Commercial Activities Panel to move to a process based more on the Federal Acquisition Regulation, Styles said. The FAR covers the process used to buy commercial products and services from the private sector.

The changes will also include folding in Circular A-97, which details how federal agencies can provide service to state and local agencies, and OFPP Policy Letter 92-1, which spells out what are inherently governmental vs. commercial-type functions, she said.

These moves were applauded by the other public- and private-sector officials at the hearing, although all said they plan to watch carefully before deciding whether the changes truly meet the need for a more fair and understandable competition process than what is now available using A-76.

The new process will be used primarily as the way to meet the competitive sourcing goals set under the President's Management Agenda. This includes competing at least 15 percent of the government functions deemed to be commercial-like activities by the end of fiscal 2003.

Federal employee unions' concerns primarily are focused on the issue of agencies' in-house resources and expertise. They worry that the government will send work to the private sector rather than spending money on training and infrastructure because outsourcing is cheaper in the short-term, said Colleen Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees Union, and Jacqueline Simon, director of public policy for the American Federation of Government Employees.


  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

  • Comment
    Pilot Class. The author and Barbie Flowers are first row third and second from right, respectively.

    How VA is disrupting tech delivery

    A former Digital Service specialist at the Department of Veterans Affairs explains efforts to transition government from a legacy "project" approach to a more user-centered "product" method.

  • Cloud
    cloud migration

    DHS cloud push comes with complications

    A pressing data center closure schedule and an ensuing scramble to move applications means that some Homeland Security components might need more than one hop to get to the cloud.

Stay Connected


Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.