Letter to the editor

We are "sort of" in the same boat as the Federal Aviation Administration workers in your article ["FAA pay raise issue lingers"].

I work for a non-appropriated fund organization that is part of the Army. I, along with my fellow programmers, did not benefit from the 7 percent to 12 percent pay raise that most of the government people in our field received.

The military decided that the non-appropriated fund employees should be in so-called "bands." That is, there is a minimum wage and maximum wage for a "band" and theoretically a worker can negotiate for his wage anywhere within that "band."

This was done sometime in the early 1980s and since that time our pay has fallen behind the scale that we were equivalent to, the GS pay scale. Since this pay band schedule went into effect, I know of two people that were able to negotiate for a higher wage.

If the FAA people feel like they are second-rate, this makes us third-rate.

Name withheld upon request


We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected


Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.