Letter to the editor

In Milt Zall's column "The kiss of death?" [FCW, Sept. 30], he states that he does not understand the "call for greater flexibility in the current system of classifying and paying [federal] workers."

Greater flexibility is needed because, in many cases, the current classification system does not adequately describe the work people perform. Today's environment is less about "jobs" and more about achieving results. Today's employees need to develop skills that are transportable across occupations and between organizations to enhance the efficiency and impact of delivering results to customers.

This cannot happen without more flexibility in the system. This is something that private industry and many forward-thinking organizations (like the federal CIO Council Workforce and Human Capital for IT Committee) have realized for a long time.

John Tindal

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.

Featured

  • Federal 100 Awards
    Federal 100 logo

    Fed 100 nominations are now open

    Help us identify this year's outstanding individuals in federal IT.

  • Defense
    The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) reveal concept renderings for the Next NGA West (N2W) campus from the design-build team McCarthy HITT winning proposal. The entirety of the campus is anticipated to be operational in 2025.

    How NGA is tackling interoperability challenges

    Mark Munsell, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency’s CTO, talks about talent shortages and how the agency is working to get more unclassified data.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.