An e-gov checklist

Whether fighting terrorism or improving food safety, agencies rarely manage to work well together. Yet, under the citizen-centered e-government goal of the Bush administration's management agenda, special emphasis is placed on creating "one-stop," cross-agency e-government initiatives to provide integrated services to the American taxpayer.

How well are agencies working together in e-government? Are there lessons that can be learned from e-government and applied in other areas in which improved cross-agency coordination is needed?

This summer, the Performance Institute, in association with a coalition of "good government" groups, visited with major federal departments as part of a governmentwide research project examining ways to measure and evaluate the success of the administration's e-government efforts.

Our research findings, detailed in our recently released report titled "Creating a Performance-Based Electronic Government," offer a number of observations, lessons learned and potential recommendations for improvements in the way federal agencies manage e-government initiatives, especially those that cut across multiple agencies.

Suggestions include:

* Prioritize and focus on areas where coordination is needed most: E-government officials indicated that setting priorities is crucial to focusing attention and effort where cross-agency coordination can have the best impact.

For example, the Office of Management and Budget began carrying out the President's Management Agenda by surveying federal agencies for suggested cross-agency projects that could have "high payoff" and could be implemented in 18 to 24 months. OMB considered more than 350 projects before settling on the administration's 24 e-government initiatives.

* Designate a lead agency to manage the project, facilitate coordination and provide leadership, not mandates, to initiative partners: Although the report validated the "managing partner" approach to managing cross-agency e-government initiatives for the most part, several officials interviewed expressed serious concerns about the approach practiced by OMB and managing partners in determining the direction, funding sources and architecture for each initiative.

The report also found that centralizing funding for multiagency initiatives might help overcome traditional barriers to coordination.

One way to bridge the divide between two or more agencies is to subject them to shared performance goals and measurements. Furthermore, perhaps the single most important factor cited in interviews was the need for strong, sustained leadership by political appointees in each agency involved in a multiagency effort.

DeMaio is president of the Performance Institute, a think tank. A full copy of "Creating a Performance-Based Electronic Government" is available at www.performanceweb.org.

Featured

  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.