Letters to the editor

Following are responses to an FCW.com poll question that asked: "Do you favor dividing the Senior Executive Service into a corps of managers and a corps of technical experts?"

Far too many good technical people are "lost" to management roles in order to increase pay. Many are not good managers though they were excellent technicians. In this age of information technology modernization projects, retention of technical people is of critical importance.

Mark St. Jean Internal Revenue Service

***

If the objective is to attract and pay highly qualified technicians, there are other avenues, such as returning to the old supergrades (e.g., GS-16, 17, 18) for such individuals.

The purpose of the SES, to establish a pool of top-level federal executives, should not be compromised. Its original purpose was valid. The service needs to be strengthened.

Name withheld by request

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.

Featured

  • Veterans Affairs
    Blue Signage and logo of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

    VA health record go-live pushed back to July

    The Department of Veterans Affairs is delaying a planned initial deployment of its $16 billion electronic health record project by four months, but is promising added functionality at the go-live date.

  • Workforce
    The Pentagon (Photo by Ivan Cholakov / Shutterstock)

    Esper says he didn't seek the authority to gut DOD unions

    Defense Secretary Mark Esper told lawmakers he was waiting for a staff analysis of a recent presidential memo before deciding whether to leverage new authority.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.