Letters to the editor

Following are responses to an FCW.com poll question that asked: "Do you favor dividing the Senior Executive Service into a corps of managers and a corps of technical experts?"

Most people in SES positions are noted for either their past government experience or area of expertise. Breaking the positions down by type would only limit agencies' ability to hire.

Also, a few SES positions are used to reward supporters after elections. These positions are essentially of a nondescript nature.

John DiIorio HCA Retired from Defense Department

***

Splitting the Senior Executive Service into management/nonmanagement is a particularly BAD idea.

SES is a creation designed to screen and supply managers with certain minimum skills to the federal government. If the problem is compensation, then reopen and rationalize the grades of GS-16 through GS-18.

Be honest and call a senior scientist a senior scientist and not an agency executive.

Name withheld by request

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.

Featured

  • Defense

    DOD wants prime contractors to be 'help desk' for new cybersecurity model

    The Defense Department is pushing forward with its unified cybersecurity standard for contractors and wants large companies and industry associations to show startups and smaller firms the way.

  • FCW Perspectives
    tech process (pkproject/Shutterstock.com)

    Understanding the obstacles to automation

    As RPA moves from buzzword to practical applications, agency leaders say it’s forcing broader discussions about business operations

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.