Letters to the editor

Following are responses to an FCW.com poll question that asked: "Do you favor dividing the Senior Executive Service into a corps of managers and a corps of technical experts?"

Most people in SES positions are noted for either their past government experience or area of expertise. Breaking the positions down by type would only limit agencies' ability to hire.

Also, a few SES positions are used to reward supporters after elections. These positions are essentially of a nondescript nature.

John DiIorio HCA Retired from Defense Department

***

Splitting the Senior Executive Service into management/nonmanagement is a particularly BAD idea.

SES is a creation designed to screen and supply managers with certain minimum skills to the federal government. If the problem is compensation, then reopen and rationalize the grades of GS-16 through GS-18.

Be honest and call a senior scientist a senior scientist and not an agency executive.

Name withheld by request

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.

Featured

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

  • Comment
    Pilot Class. The author and Barbie Flowers are first row third and second from right, respectively.

    How VA is disrupting tech delivery

    A former Digital Service specialist at the Department of Veterans Affairs explains efforts to transition government from a legacy "project" approach to a more user-centered "product" method.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.