Letters to the editor

Following are responses to an FCW.com poll question that asked: "Do you favor dividing the Senior Executive Service into a corps of managers and a corps of technical experts?"

Most people in SES positions are noted for either their past government experience or area of expertise. Breaking the positions down by type would only limit agencies' ability to hire.

Also, a few SES positions are used to reward supporters after elections. These positions are essentially of a nondescript nature.

John DiIorio HCA Retired from Defense Department

***

Splitting the Senior Executive Service into management/nonmanagement is a particularly BAD idea.

SES is a creation designed to screen and supply managers with certain minimum skills to the federal government. If the problem is compensation, then reopen and rationalize the grades of GS-16 through GS-18.

Be honest and call a senior scientist a senior scientist and not an agency executive.

Name withheld by request

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.

Featured

  • FCW Perspectives
    remote workers (elenabsl/Shutterstock.com)

    Post-pandemic IT leadership

    The rush to maximum telework did more than showcase the importance of IT -- it also forced them to rethink their own operations.

  • Management
    shutterstock image By enzozo; photo ID: 319763930

    Where does the TMF Board go from here?

    With a $1 billion cash infusion, relaxed repayment guidelines and a surge in proposals from federal agencies, questions have been raised about whether the board overseeing the Technology Modernization Fund has been scaled to cope with its newfound popularity.

Stay Connected