Letters to the Editor

Following are responses to an FCW.com poll question that asked: "Do you favor dividing the Senior Executive Service into a corps of managers and a corps of technical experts?"

One senior service would eliminate duplication that already exists in some parts of government. For example, the Department of Health and Human Services has the SBRS (Senior Biomedical Research Service) in addition to the SES.

Only one senior service is necessary. This would finally shake the government out of its naive position that only "management" positions are worthy of increased recognition and pay. The core value in any senior service is performance and significant accomplishment in advancing the mission of the government and not on whether the title is "executive" or "technical/scientific expert."

John O'Rangers


The Nuclear Regulatory Commission uses the SES and the Senior Level system where the Senior Level is the technical expert. The only downside is that the program was implemented too late and too many of the SES employees should have been SLs.

Name withheld by request


We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


  • IT Modernization
    shutterstock image By enzozo; photo ID: 319763930

    OMB provides key guidance for TMF proposals amid surge in submissions

    Deputy Federal CIO Maria Roat details what makes for a winning Technology Modernization Fund proposal as agencies continue to submit major IT projects for potential funding.

  • gears and money (zaozaa19/Shutterstock.com)

    Worries from a Democrat about the Biden administration and federal procurement

    Steve Kelman is concerned that the push for more spending with small disadvantaged businesses will detract from the goal of getting the best deal for agencies and taxpayers.

Stay Connected