Letters to the Editor

Following are responses to an FCW.com poll question that asked: "Do you favor dividing the Senior Executive Service into a corps of managers and a corps of technical experts?"

One senior service would eliminate duplication that already exists in some parts of government. For example, the Department of Health and Human Services has the SBRS (Senior Biomedical Research Service) in addition to the SES.

Only one senior service is necessary. This would finally shake the government out of its naive position that only "management" positions are worthy of increased recognition and pay. The core value in any senior service is performance and significant accomplishment in advancing the mission of the government and not on whether the title is "executive" or "technical/scientific expert."

John O'Rangers


The Nuclear Regulatory Commission uses the SES and the Senior Level system where the Senior Level is the technical expert. The only downside is that the program was implemented too late and too many of the SES employees should have been SLs.

Name withheld by request


We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


    pentagon cloud

    Court orders temporary block on JEDI

    JEDI, the Defense Department’s multi-billion-dollar cloud procurement, is officially on hold, according to a federal court announcement Feb. 13.

  • Defense
    mock-up of the shore-based Aegis Combat Information Center

    Pentagon focuses on research, cyber in 2021 budget request

    The Defense Department wants to significantly increase funds for research, cyber, and cloud.

Stay Connected


Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.