Letters to the editor

Following are responses to an FCW.com poll question that asked: "Do you favor dividing the Senior Executive Service into a corps of managers and a corps of technical experts?"

Currently, most technical positions are capped at GS-13/14. The qualifications and pay scales of GS-13/14s are at about the low/middle level of private-sector technical people. Government technical staff usually cannot go any higher unless they take on supervisory positions starting at GS-15. However, most GS-15 positions have low technical requirements and call for greater management skills. This really prohibits advanced technical experts from joining or staying in the government.

The separation will establish a rewarding career path for technical people, recognizing the important contributions of technical experts—just like the private sector.

Name withheld by request


It's a really bad idea. SES should have people with strong management expertise. A technical corps will just allow more technical people with no or minimum management skill to "legitimately" perform management functions.

Higher GS levels and pay (above GS-15) should be created to recognize and reward technical expertise.

Name withheld by request


We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


  • IT Modernization
    shutterstock image By enzozo; photo ID: 319763930

    OMB provides key guidance for TMF proposals amid surge in submissions

    Deputy Federal CIO Maria Roat details what makes for a winning Technology Modernization Fund proposal as agencies continue to submit major IT projects for potential funding.

  • gears and money (zaozaa19/Shutterstock.com)

    Worries from a Democrat about the Biden administration and federal procurement

    Steve Kelman is concerned that the push for more spending with small disadvantaged businesses will detract from the goal of getting the best deal for agencies and taxpayers.

Stay Connected