<b>WEB EXTRA:</b> Mission Control -- Individuals aren’t the only users of government services

With the release of the president’s proposed 2004 budget, federal managers ought to have a fair idea of whether they’ll receive enough money to cover the anticipated costs of developing and operating systems that support programs.

That shouldn’t end their worries, though. Carrying over from last year’s President’s Management Agenda is a performance improvement imperative now linked to the budget process. The administration even developed a Program Assessment Rating Tool to integrate of performance measures and budget.

In short: No performance improvement, no budget.

The rhetorical objective of the President’s Management Agenda is better and less-expensive service to citizens. By focusing on both internal systems performance and on the quality of citizen interactions, the Bush team hopes it can spur improvements.

But taxpaying citizens aren’t the only government customers, and there’s plenty of room for improvement in noncitizen transactions, too.

Industry has a direct stake in the action of government, so it should also benefit from the promise of performance improvement. But companies don’t vote.

Suppose instead that the experience industry has in dealing with the government could somehow be quantified and that those measures could be applied to government performance? Every company, large or small, could indirectly influence spending on e-government as it relates to industry.

It’s likely agencies and their program managers would get more constructive feedback than they could handle.

By contrast, individual taxpayers are mostly passive. They review campaign rhetoric, vote, watch the swearing-in ceremonies, and repeat the process two or four years later.

Voters rarely make decisions based on the performance of federal agency programs. They vote for or against war, transportation bonds, better schools or a cleaner environment.

So if there’s disconnect between how taxpayers vote and the performance results of federal agencies, why not involve businesses in evaluating the results of government performance improvements?

Bob Deller analyzes the federal IT market. He can be reached at bdeller@markess.com.

About the Author

Connect with the GCN staff on Twitter @GCNtech.


  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected


Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.