Letter to the editor

Following is a response to an FCW.com poll question that asked: "Do you favor dividing the Senior Executive Service into a corps of managers and a corps of technical experts?"

SES ought to be more about leadership and dealing with change and less about management and dealing with complexity.

People who can deal effectively with change come from a variety of backgrounds and disciplines. Developing and applying leadership skills ought to be the common element in SES. The diversity of the backgrounds and experiences of SES ought to be harnessed and leveraged to deal with change.

Forming two classes of SES would detract from the cohesion it ought to be developing. If specific initiatives require exceptional and deep technical talent, the government ought to have a way of bringing in such talent as it once had via the PL 313 [Project Leader] route.

Frank Nicolai

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.

Featured

  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.