Letter to the editor

Following is a response to an FCW.com poll question that asked: "Do you favor dividing the Senior Executive Service into a corps of managers and a corps of technical experts?"

SES ought to be more about leadership and dealing with change and less about management and dealing with complexity.

People who can deal effectively with change come from a variety of backgrounds and disciplines. Developing and applying leadership skills ought to be the common element in SES. The diversity of the backgrounds and experiences of SES ought to be harnessed and leveraged to deal with change.

Forming two classes of SES would detract from the cohesion it ought to be developing. If specific initiatives require exceptional and deep technical talent, the government ought to have a way of bringing in such talent as it once had via the PL 313 [Project Leader] route.

Frank Nicolai

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity
    Boy looks under voting booth at Ventura Polling Station for California primary Ventura County, California. Joseph Sohm / Shutterstock.com

    FBI breach notice rules lauded by states, but some want more

    A recent policy change by the FBI would notify states when their local election systems are hacked, but some state officials and lawmakers want the feds to inform a broader range of stakeholders in the election ecosystem.

  • paths (cybrain/Shutterstock.com)

    Does strategic planning help organizations?

    Steve Kelman notes growing support for strategic planning efforts -- and the steps agencies take to keep those plans relevant.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.