Letter to the editor

Following is a response to an FCW.com poll question that asked: "Does the federal IT budget have enough money for the work you are doing?"

I voted "yes" because I think there is enough funding for the projects that really need to be done—IF a rigorous, enterprisewide investment review process is followed.

Such review should be done at two levels: (1) program and system managers who run daily operations and (2) senior executives who make the final decision.

If business cases pay exhaustive attention to dependencies with concurrent projects, processes and risks, and if proposed solutions involve open, best-in-business technologies, one is halfway there.

With rigorous, careful project management, unintended consequences and cost overruns can be kept to a minimum. The result is something that the agency and the public alike can admire.

If we can't all operate like that, our projects shouldn't get the funding in the first place.

Name withheld by request

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.

Featured

  • FCW Perspectives
    remote workers (elenabsl/Shutterstock.com)

    Post-pandemic IT leadership

    The rush to maximum telework did more than showcase the importance of IT -- it also forced them to rethink their own operations.

  • Management
    shutterstock image By enzozo; photo ID: 319763930

    Where does the TMF Board go from here?

    With a $1 billion cash infusion, relaxed repayment guidelines and a surge in proposals from federal agencies, questions have been raised about whether the board overseeing the Technology Modernization Fund has been scaled to cope with its newfound popularity.

Stay Connected