Letter to the editor

Following is a response to an FCW.com poll question that asked: "Does the federal IT budget have enough money for the work you are doing?"

I voted "yes" because I think there is enough funding for the projects that really need to be done—IF a rigorous, enterprisewide investment review process is followed.

Such review should be done at two levels: (1) program and system managers who run daily operations and (2) senior executives who make the final decision.

If business cases pay exhaustive attention to dependencies with concurrent projects, processes and risks, and if proposed solutions involve open, best-in-business technologies, one is halfway there.

With rigorous, careful project management, unintended consequences and cost overruns can be kept to a minimum. The result is something that the agency and the public alike can admire.

If we can't all operate like that, our projects shouldn't get the funding in the first place.

Name withheld by request

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.

Featured

  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.