Letter to the editor

{italics} Following is a response to an FCW.com poll question that asked: "Is the Bush administration on the right track with the concept of consolidating IT projects?"

I've been an advocate of consolidating information technology projects for years, but unfortunately, most IT management projects are given to people who don't even know computers, let alone databases or programming issues.

Within our agency, I keep seeing approved projects going through each year to "create a database for" XYZ types of data. These so-called database projects are simply a spreadsheet with no data verification or integrity checks, the data is not shared, and after the "project" completes a publication, the so-called database disappears.

The information is not shared except as a publication, even though most of the "database" fields do have correlations within other existing (real) databases.

This just leads to the next project that gets to regather all of that previous and other information, re-input it into another spreadsheet, just to hide it again later.

Name withheld by request

WRITE US

We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.

Featured

  • IT Modernization
    shutterstock image By enzozo; photo ID: 319763930

    OMB provides key guidance for TMF proposals amid surge in submissions

    Deputy Federal CIO Maria Roat details what makes for a winning Technology Modernization Fund proposal as agencies continue to submit major IT projects for potential funding.

  • gears and money (zaozaa19/Shutterstock.com)

    Worries from a Democrat about the Biden administration and federal procurement

    Steve Kelman is concerned that the push for more spending with small disadvantaged businesses will detract from the goal of getting the best deal for agencies and taxpayers.

Stay Connected