Letters to the Editor

Following are responses to an FCW.com poll question that asked: "Is the Bush administration on the right track with the concept of consolidating IT projects?"

NO. History is replete with failures in large, consolidated, "cure-all/end-all" information technology programs and projects in the government. They NEVER work as intended, and they ALWAYS cost more than intended.

Smaller, integrated, incremental projects have the record of success. Awareness and integration is the key — not consolidation.

Name withheld by request


It seems to me if you put all your eggs in one basket — consolidation — that the vulnerabilities would increase rather than decrease.

I am not a techie — I'm an administrator of the Information Security Program in Houston — so I really can't tell you the technical reasons for my gut feeling. Every time we centralize a program, it becomes problematic and it is decentralized.

Ken Medway

VA Medical Center


We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

  • Comment
    Pilot Class. The author and Barbie Flowers are first row third and second from right, respectively.

    How VA is disrupting tech delivery

    A former Digital Service specialist at the Department of Veterans Affairs explains efforts to transition government from a legacy "project" approach to a more user-centered "product" method.

Stay Connected


Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.