Letters to the editor

Following are responses to an FCW.com poll question that asked: "Is it necessary to create a chief acquisition officer at each agency?"

Federal agencies each have a senior procurement executive and typically a procurement executive. These individuals are fully responsible for the agency's acquisition program. The Federal Acquisition Regulation mandates the senior position and it sets forth acquisition responsibilities.

To permit or require each agency to establish and recruit a chief acquisition officer clearly would create additional confusion in responsibilities and cause turf battles. Moreover, the concept, in and of itself, contradicts the President's Management Agenda.

Susan Gerbing

Department of Veterans Affairs


Creating yet another high-level position to provide more power to an agency's procurement policies begs the question: Why not simply change the authority of senior procurement officers?

Although federal procurement processes still have a lot of room for improvement, another bureaucratic layer doesn't seem to be the answer. Let's hope this idea proceeds no further than Rep. Tom Davis' idea for outsourcing U.S. federal jobs and contract work to foreign countries.

These actions, quite frankly, embarrass most of us Republicans.

Bob Matz

Osprey Services Corp.


We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


  • Cybersecurity
    cybersecurity (Rawpixel/Shutterstock.com)

    CMMC clears key regulatory hurdle

    The White House approved an interim rule to mandate defense contractors prove they adhere to existing cybersecurity standards from the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

  • Budget
    Stock photo ID: 134176955 By Richard Cavalleri

    House passes stopgap spending bill

    The current appropriations bills are set to expire on Oct. 1; the bill now goes to the Senate where it is expected to pass.

Stay Connected