Network-centric warfare: Will IT save lives?

Since the last Gulf War, the Defense Department has significantly retooled how it fights wars, relying on information technology as the foundation for building a more mobile and lethal force. Today's war, waged using computer networks more than ever, will test whether DOD military planners and their contractors are right — or not.

The idea of network-centric warfare, as DOD calls it, is to feed information as quickly as possible to commanders and soldiers in the battle theater so they can make better decisions about what, when and how to attack. Network-centric warfare also has important implications for support efforts — for instance, logistical issues such as ensuring troops get the right equipment at the right time, and treating the wounded by being able to reach back to the United States to access a wounded service person's digital medical file.

Many defense strategists argue that the services, given better access to information, can travel lighter on their feet, requiring fewer troops and carrying fewer supplies. However, a little more than a week into the war, some military experts question this strategy. Ralph Peters, a retired military officer and author, wrote this month in the Washington Post that some soldiers taken prisoner last week may have been spared if DOD had fielded a larger force.

The second goal is not so evident, but just as crucial for political and humane reasons. Network-centric warfare, because it can help deliver weapons precisely to military targets, should reduce the number of casualties among Iraqi citizens, a clear goal of the Bush administration. "In the event of conflict, America also accepts our responsibility to protect innocent lives in every way possible," Bush said before the war started. In the 1991 Gulf War, an estimated 2,000 to 3,000 Iraqi civilians were killed. In this war, a compilation of media reports estimates Iraqi civilian deaths at about 300 as of March 27 — the war's ninth day.

It is difficult to conclude this early in the war if DOD's reliance on IT is meeting the administration's objectives. Sure, mistakes and miscalculations will occur. But how DOD adjusts its reliance on IT will be key to whether it can keep the promise of the technology realistic. n


  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected


Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.