Letters to the editor

Following are responses to an FCW.com poll question that asked: "Should federal IT project managers be made to qualify for their jobs?"

It is about time the government selected project managers based on skill set rather than political connections.

Only good can come of requiring project managers to be trained, experienced and held accountable for/rewarded for their actions. The taxpayers will finally get what they are paying for.

Name withheld by request


Project manager certification should not be limited to information technology. In the Defense Department and other government organizations, all project management positions should require certification.

A serious look at how business is conducted, requirements ownership and the appropriation of funds also are necessary. Most project funds are questionable from year to year. Users rarely assume total ownership of their requirements and requested changes.

Certification alone is not the answer to project overruns.

Name withheld by request


We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected


Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.